Jewish philosophy -- Early works to 1800; Judaism -- Works to 1900; Philosophy, Medieval -- Early works to 1800
3. The third view is that which is taught in Scripture, and which forms
one of the principles of our religion. It coincides with the opinion of
the philosophers in all points except one. For we believe that, even if
one has the capacity for prophecy, and has duly prepared himself, it
may yet happen that he does not actually prophesy. It is in that case
the will of God [that withholds from him the use of the faculty].
According to my opinion, this fact is as exceptional as any other
miracle, and acts in the same way. For the laws of Nature demand that
every one should be a prophet, who has a proper physical constitution,
and has been duly prepared as regards education and training. If such a
person is not a prophet, he is in the same position as a person who,
like Jeroboam (1 Kings xiii. 4), is deprived of the use of his hand, or
of his eyes, as was the case with the army of Syria, in the history of
Elisha (2 Kings vi. 18). As for the principle which I laid down, that
preparation and perfection of moral and rational faculties are the sine
quâ non, our Sages say exactly the same: “The spirit of prophecy only
rests upon persons who are wise, strong, and rich.” We have explained
these words in our Commentary on the Mishnah, and in our large work. We
stated there that the Sons of the Prophets were constantly engaged in
preparation. That those who have prepared themselves may still be
prevented from being prophets, may be inferred from the history of
Baruch, the son of Nerijah; for he followed Jeremiah, who prepared and
instructed him; and yet he hoped in vain for prophecy; comp., “I am
weary with my sighing, and rest have I not found.” He was then told
through Jeremiah, “Thus saith the Lord, Thus shalt thou say to him,
Thou seekest for thee great things, do not seek” (Jer. xlv. 5). It may
perhaps be assumed that prophecy is here described as a thing “too
great” for Baruch. So also the fact that “her prophets did not find
visions from the Lord” (Lam. ii. 4), may be considered as the result of
the exile of her prophets, as will be explained (chap. xxxvi.). There
are, however, numerous passages in Scripture as well as in the writings
of our Sages, which support the principle that it depends chiefly on
the will of God who is to prophesy, and at what time; and that He only
selects the best and the wisest. We hold that fools and ignorant people
are unfit for this distinction. It is as impossible for any one of
these to prophesy as it is for an ass or a frog; for prophecy is
impossible without study and training; when these have created the
possibility, then it depends on the will of God whether the possibility
is to be turned into reality. We must not be misled by the words of
Jeremiah (i. 5), “Before I formed thee in the womb I knew thee, and
before thou camest forth from the womb I have sanctified thee”; for
this is the case with all prophets; there must be a physical
preparation from the beginning of their existence, as will be
explained.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account