Jewish philosophy -- Early works to 1800; Judaism -- Works to 1900; Philosophy, Medieval -- Early works to 1800
The question, What is the object of the creation? must be left
unanswered. The creation is the result of the will of God. Also those
who believe that the Universe is eternal must admit that they are
unable to discover the purpose of the Universe. It would, however, not
be illogical to assume that the spheres have been created for the sake
of man, notwithstanding the great dimensions of the former and the
smallness of the latter. Still it must be conceded that, even if
mankind were the main and central object of creation, there is no
absolute interdependence between them; for it is a matter of course
that, under altered conditions, man could exist without the spheres.
All teleological theories must therefore be confined within the limits
of the Universe as it now exists. They are only admissible in the
relation in which the several parts of the Universe stand to each
other; but the purpose of the Universe as a whole cannot be accounted
for. It is simply an emanation from the will of God.
Regarding the belief in Providence, Maimonides enumerates the following
five opinions:—1. There is no Providence; everything is subject to
chance; 2. Only a part of the Universe is governed by Providence, viz.,
the spheres, the species, and such individual beings as possess the
power of perpetuating their existence (e.g., the stars); the rest—that
is, the sublunary world—is left to mere chance. 3. Everything is
predetermined; according to this theory, revealed Law is inconceivable.
4. Providence assigns its blessings to all creatures, according to
their merits; accordingly, all beings, even the lowest animals, if
innocently injured or killed, receive compensation in a future life. 5.
According to the Jewish belief, all living beings are endowed with
free-will; God is just, and the destiny of man depends on his merits.
Maimonides denies the existence of trials inflicted by Divine love,
i.e. afflictions which befall man, not as punishments of sin, but as
means to procure for him a reward in times to come. Maimonides also
rejects the notion that God ordains special temptation. The Biblical
account, according to which God tempts men, “to know what is in their
hearts,” must not be taken in its literal sense; it merely states that
God made the virtues of certain people known to their fellowmen in
order that their good example should be followed. Of all creatures man
alone enjoys the especial care of Providence; because the acts of
Providence are identical with certain influences (shefaʻ) which the
Active Intellect brings to bear upon the human intellect; their effect
upon man varies according to his physical, moral, and intellectual
condition; irrational beings, however, cannot be affected by these
influences. If we cannot in each individual case see how these
principles are applied, it must be borne in mind that God’s wisdom is
far above that of man. The author seems to have felt that his theory
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account