The Gun Alley Tragedy: Record of the Trial of Colin Campbell RossBrennan, T. C. (Thomas Cornelius)
History
The Gun Alley Tragedy: Record of the Trial of Colin Campbell Ross
Brennan, T. C. (Thomas Cornelius)
Ross, Colin Campbell, 1892-1922 -- Trials, litigation, etc.; Trials (Murder) -- Australia -- Victoria -- Melbourne
Dunstan was then called to corroborate Harding. He was awaiting trial
with Harding for housebreaking, and at the Police Court he had pleaded
guilty, and had exonerated Harding. It should be recalled here,
however, that when the two men came up for trial, and the same course
was adopted, the jury declined to accept the story that Harding knew
nothing of the charge, and he was found guilty of receiving. Dunstan
had twice previously been convicted of larceny, and he was one of the
five that were in the remand yard on January 23. His story was that
he heard certain answers made by Ross, but only one question put by
Harding. The answers were: “I was talking to the girl”; “if they do
find any wine inside her, that ain’t to say I gave it to her”; “my
brother was serving”; “I left my girl at half-past 10”; “I ain’t the
only man that has got a disease”; “no, a bike”; “I will ask the old
bastard what he was doing there at half-past 1”; “Ammunition Works.”
The only question he heard Harding ask was: “How was she dressed?”
Dunstan admitted that when Ross came back from the inquest Ross said
to him: “That is a nice cobber of yours, to go into the box and swear
a man’s life away.” Dunstan had not been called at the inquest. He said
that he first told the Governor what he had heard on the Friday or the
Saturday two or three days after the inquest. He had had opportunities
for quiet talks with Harding in the meantime, but there had been no
conversations on the subject of Harding’s evidence. He said he had
never read in the papers any account of Harding’s evidence. Harding had
asked him had he heard the conversation, and he had told Harding that
what he had heard he would tell to the governor of the gaol. He had not
told Harding, because he “didn’t have much time for him.” Being shown a
copy of the “Herald,” with Harding’s photograph in it, and being asked
if he had seen that before, he said: “I do believe I did.” He couldn’t
say when it was, but it was when it was in gaol. He had said that he
never read a paper in gaol, but that didn’t mean that he had never seen
one. It was only a passing glance of the “Herald” as he walked up and
down the yard.
Harding, who had been out of court, was then recalled, and further
cross-examined by Mr. Maxwell. He said that, on the day following the
inquest, he and Dunstan were reading a paper, either the “Age” or the
“Herald”—that is, he was reading it aloud, and Dunstan was looking over
his shoulder. He had often had papers lent from the adjoining yards,
and on these occasions Dunstan got the benefit of them.
ROSS’S MOVEMENTS.
We now come to a different class of evidence—the evidence which
purported to tell of the movements of Ross on the important dates. The
conflict between this evidence and the supposed confessions and the
inherent improbability of the evidence itself will be dealt with later.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account