The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy FawkesSpink, Henry
History
The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy Fawkes
Spink, Henry
Gunpowder Plot, 1605; Monteagle, William Parker, Baron, 1574 or 1575-1622
[Footnote 98:——Did Mounteagle likewise behold Fawkes? If so, his
self-command apparently was extraordinary; for, almost certainly,
Mounteagle must have met Fawkes at White Webbs, if not at the Lord
Montague’s and elsewhere. Fawkes was so strict and regular in his habits
and deportment that he was thought to be a priest or a Jesuit (I suppose,
a Jesuit lay-brother). That Tesimond should think that part of the
“_King’s Book_” fabulous which describes this “perusing of the vault” and
finding of Fawkes, is just what I should expect Tesimond, erroneously,
would think; inasmuch as this particular Jesuit would naturally enough
consider it to be simply incredible that Mounteagle should not have
displayed some outward token, however slight, of recognising Fawkes, who
would be sure to carry with him his characteristic air of calm and high
distinction, even amid “the wood and coale” of his “master” Thomas Percy.
But Tesimond did not know what a perfect tutoring Mounteagle had received
from his mentor to qualify him to play so well his part in life at this
supreme juncture. Thomas Ward was evidently a consummate diplomatist. If
he had been trained under Walsingham he would certainly “know a thing or
two.”]
[Footnote 99:——It is to be remembered that, for the first time, the powder
was found by Knevet and his men about midnight of Monday, the 4th of
November. Previous to, possibly, late in the day of the 4th of November, I
do not think that Salisbury and Suffolk knew any more about the existence
of this powder than “the man in the moon.” Such ignorance on their part
redounded to their great discredit, and would be, doubtless, duly noted by
the small and timid, yet sharp, mind of James. But the Country’s
confidence in the Government had to be maintained at all costs; hence the
comical, side-glance, slantingdicular, ninny-pinny way in which the
“_King’s Book_,” for the most part, is drawn up. A re-publication of the
“_King’s Book_,” and of “_The Fawkeses, of York_,” by R. Davies, sometime
Town Clerk of York (Nichols, 1850), are desiderata to the historical
student of the Gunpowder Plot.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account