The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy FawkesSpink, Henry
History
The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy Fawkes
Spink, Henry
Gunpowder Plot, 1605; Monteagle, William Parker, Baron, 1574 or 1575-1622
I readily allow that it is difficult to believe that neither Salisbury,
nor Suffolk, nor anybody (not even a bird-like-eyed Dame Quickly of
busy-bodying propensities residing in the neighbourhood) knew of this
powder, which had been (at least some of it) in Percy’s house and an
outhouse adjoining the Parliament House. Still, even if they did know
(whether statesmen or housewife) of the _Gunpowder_, it does not follow,
either in fact or in logic, that they knew of the _Gunpowder Plot_. For
they might reasonably enough conclude that the ammunition was to carry out
“the practice for some stir” which Salisbury admits that he knew the
recusants had in hand at that Parliament.——See “_Winwood’s Memorials_,”
Ed. 1725, vol. ii., p. 72.——Moreover, for such a purpose, in the natural
order of things, I take it, the powder would be brought in first, then the
shot, muskets, armour, swords, daggers, pikes, crossbows, arrows, and
other ordnance. (_The barrels, empty or nearly so, would be carried in
first._)
Sir Thomas Knevet, of Norfolk, was created Baron Knevett, of Escrick, near
York, in 1607. He died without male issue. He went to the Parliament House
on the night of November 4th, 1605, as a Justice of the Peace for
Westminster.——See Nichols’ “_Progresses of James I._,” vol. i., p.
582.——Escrick is now the seat of the Lord Wenlock.]
[Footnote 100:——“_Hatfield MS._,” 110, 30. Quoted in “the Rev. J. H.
Pollen’s S.J., thoughtful and learned booklet, entitled “_Father Garnet
and the Gunpowder Plot_” (Catholic Truth Society’s publication, London).]
[Footnote 101:——See Jardine’s Letter to Sir Henry Ellis, K.H., F.R.S.,
Feb., 1841, in “_Archæologia_,” vol. xxix., p. 100. This letter should be
carefully read by every serious student of the Plot.]
[Footnote 102:——Sir William Stanley, of Hooton (in that strip of Cheshire
between the Mersey and the Dee), was not seen by Fawkes between Easter and
the end of August, 1605, when Fawkes went over to Flanders for the last
time in his career so adventurous and so pathetic. Sir William knew
nothing of the Gunpowder Plot. It was said that he surrendered Deventer in
pursuance of the counsel of Captain Roland Yorke, who to the Spaniards had
himself surrendered Zutphen Sconce. These surrenders to the Spaniards on
the part of two English gentlemen were strange pieces of business, and one
would like the whole question to be thoroughly and severely searched into
again. As to Roland Yorke, see Camden’s “_Queen Elizabeth_.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account