The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy Fawkes — John Shaqi
The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy FawkesSpink, Henry
History
The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy Fawkes
Spink, Henry
Gunpowder Plot, 1605; Monteagle, William Parker, Baron, 1574 or 1575-1622
The _causa causans_, or originating cause, of the Gunpowder Treason Plot,
in its ultimate analysis, will be found to involve that problem of
problems for Princes, Statesmen, and Peoples all the world over:——How to
allow freedom of human action, and yet faithfully to maintain Absolute
Truth concerning the Infinite and the Eternal——or that which is believed
to be Absolute Truth.
To the intent that the mind of the reader may ever and anon find relief
from the stress and strain occasioned by the dry discussion of Evidence
and the severe reasoning from necessary or probable philosophical
assumptions, the writer has designedly interspersed, both in the Text and
in the Notes, matter of a Biographical and Topographical nature,
especially such as hath relation to the author’s honoured native
County——Yorkshire——and his beloved native City——York.
The writer has thought out his thesis, and has treated the same without
fear or favour——limited and conditioned only by a regard for what he knew
or supposed, and therefore believed, to be the truth governing the
subject-matter under consideration. Nobody can say more, not even the most
advanced or emancipated thinker living.[A]
[Footnote A: _Cf._, “_The Ethic of Free-thought_,” by Professor Karl
Pearson. (Adam and Charles Black, 1901.)]
If it be demanded of the author why a member of the lower branch of the
legal profession hath essayed the unveiling of a mystery that has baffled
the learning and ingenuity of men from the days of King James I.——the
British Solomon——down to the days of Dr. Samuel Rawson Gardiner, the
renowned historian of the early English Stuarts, the author’s answer and
plea must be——for it can only be——that by the decrees of Fate, _his_ eyes
first saw the light of the sun in a County whose history is an epitome of
the history of the English people; and in a City which is an England in
miniature.
In conclusion, the writer would be fain to be pardoned in saying that he
has not had the advantage of frequenting any British or Foreign
University, or other seat of learning——all the education that he can make
his humble boast of having been received in Yorkshire Protestant Schools.
The writer’s guide, during the past eighteen months, wherein he hath
“voyaged through strange seas of thought alone,”[A] has been “the high
white star of Truth. THERE he has gazed, and THERE aspired.”[B]
_Saturday, 26th October, 1901._
[Footnote A: Wordsworth.]
[Footnote B: Matthew Arnold.]
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
PAGE
INTRODUCTORY LETTER TO THE VISCOUNT HALIFAX vii
PREFACE xiii
PRELUDE xxxv
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account