The _Label_, borne as a Mark of Cadency, was sometimes, particularly in
the cases of junior members of the Royal Family, charged with other
figures and devices, as differences of a secondary rank. Or, when it is
thus charged, the charges upon a Label may be considered to be elements
of the Label itself, in its capacity of a Mark of Cadency. EDMOND, the
first Earl of LANCASTER, as I have already shown, No. 249, differenced
his father’s Arms of England with a _Label of France_, No. 338--an azure
label, that is, charged with golden fleurs de lys, to denote his French
alliance; and thus by the same process he was Marshalling and Marking
Cadency. JOHN OF GHENT, Duke of LANCASTER, differenced with an _ermine
Label_, No. 339, derived from the ermine shield of Brittany (No. 15):
and the Plantagenet Dukes of YORK charged each point of their silver
Label with _three torteaux_, No. 340, which may be considered to have
been derived from the shield of Wake (No. 82). In order to show them on
a larger scale, the Labels in Nos. 338-343 are represented without the
Shields on which they were charged. All these Shields would be
repetitions of the same blazonry of France and England quarterly: Nos.
252 and 253.
[Illustration: No. 338.--Lancaster.]
[Illustration: No. 339.--Brittany.]
[Illustration: No. 340.--York.]
The Label, with various Differences, has generally been the Royal Mark
of Cadency; and now differenced silver Labels are borne, to mark
Cadency, by every member of our Royal Family.
[Illustration: No. 341.]
[Illustration: No. 342.]
[Illustration: No. 343.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account