The Harvest of the Sea: A contribution to the natural and economic history of the British food fishesBertram, James Glass
Science
The Harvest of the Sea: A contribution to the natural and economic history of the British food fishes
Bertram, James Glass
Fish culture; Fisheries -- Great Britain; Fishes
almost as he looks at them; hear the sweet notes of the cuckoo, and the
unceasing carol of noisier birds; watch the sportive lamb or the timid
hare; and chronicle the ever-changing seasons as they roll away on
their everlasting journey of progress.
Without pretending to rival the hundred and one guides to angling
that now flood the market, I shall take a glance at a few of the more
popular of the anglers’ fishes; not, however, in any scientific or
other order of precedence, but beginning with the trout, seeing that
the salmon is discussed in a separate division of this work.
Of all our fresh-water fishes, the one that is most plentiful, and
the one that is most worthy of notice by anglers, is the trout. It
can be fished for with the simplest possible kind of rod in the most
tiny stream, or be captured by elaborate apparatus on the great lochs
of Scotland. There are so many varieties of it as to suit all tastes;
there are well-flavoured burn trout, not so large as a small herring,
and there are lake giants that, when placed in the scales, will pull
down a twenty pound weight with the greatest ease. The usual run of
river trout are about six or eight ounces in weight; a pound trout is
an excellent reward for the patient angler. Where a trouting stream
flows through a rich and fertile district of country, with abundant
drainage, the trout are usually well-conditioned and large, and of good
flavour; but when the country through which the stream flows is poor
and rocky, with no drains carrying in food to enrich the stream, the
fish will, as a matter of course, be lanky and flavourless; they may be
numerous, but they will be of small size. It is curious, too, to note
the difference of the fish of the same stream: some of the trout taken
in Tweed, and in other rivers as well, are sharp in their colour, have
fine fat plump thick shoulders, great depth of belly, and beautiful
pink flesh of excellent flavour; others again are lean and flavourless.
The colour of trout is of course dependent on the quality and
abundance of its food; those are best which exist on ground-feeding,
living upon worms and such fresh-water crustaceans as are within reach.
Fly-taking fish—those that indulge in the feed of ephemeræ that takes
place a few times every day—are comparatively poor in flesh and weak in
flavour. As to where fishers should resort, must be left to themselves.
I was once beguiled out to the Dipple, but it was a hungry sort of
river, where the trout were on the average about three ounces and
scarce enough; although I must say that for a few minutes, when “the
feed” was on the water, there was an enormous display of fish, but they
preferred to remain in their native stream, a tributary of the Clyde I
think. The mountain streams and lochs of Scotland, or the placid and
picturesque lakes of Cumberland and Westmorland, are the paradise of
anglers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account