The Harvest of the Sea: A contribution to the natural and economic history of the British food fishesBertram, James Glass
Science
The Harvest of the Sea: A contribution to the natural and economic history of the British food fishes
Bertram, James Glass
Fish culture; Fisheries -- Great Britain; Fishes
Let us suppose, for example, that the fish grows at the
rate of five pounds per annum: it would, therefore, take ten years to
achieve a growth of fifty pounds. Now it is needless to say that, in
British waters at any rate, we never either see or hear of a fish of
that weight. The fact is, we do not give our salmon time to grow to
that size. The greater portion of the fish that we kill are two years
old, or at the most three—fish running from eight pounds to sixteen
pounds in weight. It is clear that, if we go on for a year or two
longer at the rate of slaughter we have been indulging of late years,
there will speedily not be even a three-year-old fish to pull out of
the water. It is very suggestive of the state of the salmon-fisheries
that we have now eaten down to our three-year-olds.
Another fertile source of destruction is the killing of grilse;
the grilse being a virgin fish, its slaughter is just analogous
to the killing of lambs without due regulation as to quantity. In
this respect, “the conduct of salmon proprietors is as rational
as high-farming with the help of tile-drains, liquid-manure, and
steam-power, would be for the purpose of eating corn in the blade.”
As many as 100,000 grilses have been taken from one river in a year—a
notable example of killing the goose for the golden egg. If we had an
Act of Parliament to prevent the capture of grilse, we should never
want salmon. The parr and smolt are protected. Why? Because they are
the young of the salmon. Well, so is grilse the young of the salmon,
and grilse also are sadly in want of protection.
[Illustration: STAKE-NETS ON THE RIVER SOLWAY.]
Recent debates in the House of Commons on the English and Scottish
Salmon Fisheries Bills brought out very distinctly the worst phase of
the salmon question—viz. the prevalence of stake and bag nets. These
machines have exercised a baneful influence on the fisheries, and
have in numerous instances intercepted about one-half of the salmon
of particular rivers, before they could reach their own waters. These
nets are erected in the tideways, not far from the shore, and as the
fish are coasting along towards their own particular spawning-ground,
they are intercepted either in the chambers of the bag-net, or in
the meshes of the stake-net. It is said, too, that fish taken in the
tidal estuaries are in far finer condition than those caught in
the fresh-water division of the large salmon rivers; hence they are
in greater demand, and bring a slightly better price. There is no
consideration among tacksmen of river fishings, or proprietors of bag
or stake nets, for the preservation of the fish; it seems to be a rule
with these gentlemen to kill all they can. It is obvious that, if the
upper proprietors of the waters were to act in the same spirit, and
kill all the salmon that reached the breeding-grounds, that fine fish,
not unaptly called the “venison of the waters,” would very speedily
become extinct.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account