The Harvest of the Sea: A contribution to the natural and economic history of the British food fishesBertram, James Glass
Science
The Harvest of the Sea: A contribution to the natural and economic history of the British food fishes
Bertram, James Glass
Fish culture; Fisheries -- Great Britain; Fishes
Another fertile source of harm to the salmon-fisheries are the fixed
engines of capture which so many people think it right to use, and
which the Lord Advocate’s Salmon Bill of 1862 left almost _in statu
quo_, except that a little power on this part of the salmon question
is given to the commissioners appointed to carry out the Act. Stake and
bag nets in Scotland are known to have been very destructive, as have
the putchers, butts, and trumpets of the English and Welsh rivers. It
would be tedious to describe the different fixed engines invented for
the capture of salmon; what I desire to show is that they have injured
the fisheries. A controversy has been raging in Scotland for some years
back on this point of the salmon question, which, there can be no
doubt, will ultimately result in their _entire_ extinction. That they
have been a most fruitful cause of injury to the fisheries has been
proved by a long array of facts and figures. A striking example of the
effect of bag-nets occurred with regard to the Tay. The system having
been extended to that river, the productiveness of the upper portions
of the stream was very speedily affected; and again, shortly after
their removal, the fisheries became greatly more productive, as will
be seen by and by when it becomes necessary to deal with the figures
denoting the rental of that river.
Although I have already referred to it, it is most important to note
here much more particularly the fact that, with probably the solitary
exception of the Tweed (and there the deterioration has only recently
been arrested), the size and weight of salmon are annually diminishing,
and, as some fishermen think, their condition and flavour also. There
can be no doubt that in the golden age of the fisheries they attained
much larger proportions than they do now. I need scarcely quote in
support of this opinion the fish mentioned by Yarrell, which was
exhibited by Mr. Groves, and weighed eighty-three pounds; nor that
alluded to by Pennant, which was only ten pounds lighter; nor the fact
that in all virgin salmon-rivers the fish average a greater weight
than any now taken in the British streams. It is within the memory
of anglers that fish of forty pounds were by no means rare in the
Scottish rivers; that salmon of thirty pounds and thirty-five pounds
weight were quite common; and that the general run of fish were in
the aggregate many pounds heavier than those of the present day. Mr.
Anderson, the lessee of some of the best salmon-fisheries on the Firth
of Forth, a gentleman who is master of his business, is of opinion that
the average weight of fish now is reduced to about sixteen pounds;
and by the Tweed Tables, the average weight of those killed by the
net between July and September, though apparently on the increase, in
no month rises to fifteen pounds. How is it, then, that we have no
giants of the river in these days? The answer, I think, is simple and
convincing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account