The Harvest of the Sea: A contribution to the natural and economic history of the British food fishesBertram, James Glass
Science
The Harvest of the Sea: A contribution to the natural and economic history of the British food fishes
Bertram, James Glass
Fish culture; Fisheries -- Great Britain; Fishes
It is not my purpose in the present work to enter into the minutiæ of
oyster life. Indeed, there have been so many controversies about the
natural history of this animal as to render it impossible to narrate
in the brief space I can devote to it a tenth part of what has been
written or spoken about the life and habits of the “breedy creature.”
Every stage of its growth has been made the stand-point for a wrangle
of some kind. As an example of the keenness with which each stage of
oyster life is now being discussed, I may mention that in the summer
of 1864 a most amusing squabble broke out in the pages of the _Field_
newspaper on an immaterial point of oyster life, which is worth noting
here as an example of what can be said on either side of a question.
The controversy hinged upon whether an oyster while on the bed lay
on the flat or convex side. Mr. Frank Buckland, who originated the
dispute, maintained that the right, proper, and natural position of
the oyster, when at the bottom of the sea, is with the flat shell
downwards. Mr. James Lowe, a gentleman who takes great interest in
pisciculture, and who has explored the oyster-beds of France, held the
opinion that the oyster is never in its proper position except when the
flat shell is uppermost. Of course, the natural position of the oyster
is of no practical importance whatever; and I know, from personal
observation of the beds at Newhaven and Cockenzie, that oysters lie
both ways,—indeed, with a dozen or two of dredges tearing over the beds
it is impossible but that they must lie quite higgledy-piggledy, so to
speak. A great deal that is incidentally interesting was brought up in
the discussion to which I have been referring. There have been several
other disputes about points in the natural history of the oysters—one
in particular as to whether that animal is provided with organs of
vision. Various opinions have been enunciated as to whether an oyster
has eyes, and one author asserts that it has so many as twenty-four,
which again is denied, and the assertion made that the so-called
eyes projecting from the border of the mantle have no optical power
whatever; but be that as it may, I have no doubt whatever that the
oyster has a power of knowing the light from the dark.
Without wishing to dogmatise on any point of oyster life, I think I can
bring before my readers in a brief way a few interesting facts in the
natural history of the edible oyster.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account