The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countriesParsons, Frank
History
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries
Parsons, Frank
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
The railroad commission in one of our giant States says the fact “that
for the most part passes are given to official persons for the purpose
of influencing official conduct, is made manifest by the fact that they
are not given to such persons except while they hold official
positions.”[6]
The president of an important railroad is stated to have said that he
“saved his company thousands of dollars a year by giving annual passes
to county auditors.” And a man who had been auditor for many years said
that the taxes of the —— railroad company were increased about $20,000 a
year because it was so stingy with its passes.[7]
Members of legislatures and of Congress have told me that after voting
against railroad measures the usual passes were not forthcoming.
A little while before the introduction of the rate legislation now
pending, in pursuance of President Roosevelt’s regulative policy, a
congressman from the Far West was visiting with us. He had free
transportation for himself and family anywhere in the United States any
time he wanted it. A lady in the family asked him if it was the same way
with the rest of the congressmen, and he said “Yes.” I have in my notes
conversations with senators and representatives from eighteen States,
and all of them stated, in reply to my questions, that passes were an
established and regular part of the perquisites of a member of Congress.
But since the Esch-Townsend bill for the fixing of rates by a government
commission came on deck, I understand that the congressmen who supported
it are learning the lesson conveyed in the pass-denying letter above
quoted, as some of the railroads are refusing all the requests of such
congressmen for free transportation. The president of one of these
railroads is reported to have said: “I never was in favor of granting
political transportation, and now I have a good opportunity to cut off
some of these deadheads. Transportation has been given them in the past
on the theory that they were friends, but when we needed friends they
were not there.”
This, however, is only a passing phase—an emergency measure to punish a
few congressmen who have shown so little appreciation of the right of
the railroads to make the laws affecting transportation, that they
actually voted for what they deemed right or for what the people
desired, rather than for what the railroads wanted.
Aside from such little eddies, the great stream of dead-headism flows on
as smooth and deep as ever. The people take the thing so much as a
matter of course that it has been a constant cause of surprise to
passengers on the New York, New Haven, and Hartford Railroad to see
Governor Douglas pay his fare day by day as he travelled to and fro on
an ordinary commutation ticket.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account