The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countriesParsons, Frank
History
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries
Parsons, Frank
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
In the summer of 1903 John Leverone of Cincinnati received 24 cars of
pineapples from Cuba. Ten cars came by the Illinois Central via New
Orleans with an icing charge of $11.37 a car. Fourteen carloads came on
Trust cars via Mobile, 100 miles nearer Cincinnati, with icing charges
of $45 a car.
Even when shipments are made in railroad refrigerators from regions the
Trust claims as its own peculiar territory, the full Trust charges are
collected and paid over to the Trust.
For example, in August, 1904, Coyne Bros. of Chicago received an
Illinois Central refrigerator car loaded with melons from Poseyville,
Indiana. The freight was $39 and the icing charge $45. The Illinois
Central icing charge for that distance was $10. Coyne Bros. went to the
manager of the railroad refrigerator service and found that the road had
an arrangement by which the Trust was to be paid at Trust rates on all
shipments from the melon region, whatever cars were used. If the firm
refused to pay the charge they would be boycotted or taken off the
credit list.
August 11, 1904, Coyne Bros. received a Louisville and Nashville car
loaded with melons from Epworth, Indiana. On the bill were two charges
for icing, one was the railroad charge of $14 and the other the Trust
charge of $45. The firm asked if they were expected to pay both charges.
The railroad then erased the $14 item. The firm refused to pay the $45
Trust charge for a service worth no more than the railroad charge of
$14, and the railroad took them off the credit list. Mr. Urion, attorney
for the Armour folks, came to Coyne Bros. and told their manager that
they must pay the ice charges or else everything shipped to them must be
prepaid. The firm found that shipments to them from the Michigan grape
region were cut off. They sent their own man to load the cars, but the
railroad agent refused to bill them. “I have my instructions from
Armour’s man here,” he said, “and I must follow them.”
On a car of melons from Carlisle, Ind., to Mr. Scales of Chicago, the
freight was $35 and the icing charge $50, representing 20 tons of ice.
There was no re-icing, and the car bunkers would not hold more than 6
tons of ice, so that there was a clear overcharge of $35 for
refrigeration.
J. D. Mead & Co. of Boston were charged $99.90 by the Armour lines for
icing on a car of peaches from Missouri. This is a startling sum for a
service that the railroads used to perform free of charge. On another
car of peaches from Maryland, the charge was $64 for icing. As the car
bunkers would not hold more than 4 to 6 tons and only one re-icing was
necessary between Cumberland and Boston, the firm protested vigorously.
They were told that the bill was a “trial bill.”
“What is that?” they asked.
“Try to collect,” said the railroad manager.
In this case, on appeal to New York, the bill was reduced to $24, a
slice of $40 off the icing bill, which was to Mr. Mead a _trial_ bill in
more senses than one.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account