The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countriesParsons, Frank
History
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries
Parsons, Frank
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
Ellis and Company of Chicago received a car of tomatoes from Gibson,
Tenn., 522 miles away, and another from New Orleans, 923 miles distant.
The first was a Trust car with $74 icing charge; the other was an
Illinois Central car with $15 icing charge. That is, the Trust charge
was 5 times as great as the railroad charge, though the railroad car
came 400 miles further, nearly double the distance in fact that the
Trust car covered.
Grapes have been shipped from the New York grape field to Boston in
Vanderbilt refrigerator cars without any icing charge, while shipments
in Trust cars between the same points in the same month paid $22 for
ice. The Michigan Central has given notice that it has withdrawn from
the Armour contract and will handle Michigan fruit products in its own
cars supplying ice at cost which it says is $2.50 per ton. So the man
who can ship over the Michigan Central will get a rate of $15 to $25 a
car to Boston, while the man who has to use the Pere Marquette will pay
$45 a car for ice.[283] Two Boston men recently (1905) had occasion to
order each a carload of peaches from Michigan points some 20 miles
apart. One car came from Coloma over the Pere Marquette with Armour
charges of $45, while the other car came from Eau Claire over the
Michigan Central with the same freight rate, but only $13.13 for
icing,—$5.63 for the original icing, $5 for re-icing at Collingwood, and
$2.50 for re-icing at West Seneca. A year ago, before the Armour
contract with the Michigan Central expired, the icing charge on both
railroads was $55 to Boston; now the Armour charge has come down to $45,
but the Armour charge for ice in the case just stated was $9 a ton while
the Vanderbilt railroads charged only $2.50 a ton, which last the
Interstate Commission in a recent case has held to be a just and
reasonable charge.[284] There are no icing charges on dairy products.
The ice is paid for by the car company and the railroad. It takes as
much ice for dairy products as for fruit, but the Trust is carrying its
own goods in this field mostly and not the goods of other shippers, and
so it has not felt the need of changing the original arrangement in
respect to ice.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account