The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countriesParsons, Frank
History
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries
Parsons, Frank
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
There are multitudes of other place discriminations besides those
related to the long and short haul question. The Business Men’s League
of St. Louis and the St. Louis Merchants Exchange complain of serious
discrimination against their city as compared with Chicago, Kansas City,
Omaha, etc., in rates on corn, wheat, oats, groceries, hardware, and
cotton.[319] Des Moines gets supplies from Chicago at 60 cents, while
Fort Dodge, the same distance from Chicago, pays 72 cents.[320] Shoe
manufacturers and wholesale grocers of Atlanta who have had to close
down declare they were ruined by discriminative freight rates. Two years
ago a prohibitive rate was put on cotton bound for Atlanta, but the
freight agents of the leading railroads entering the city were indicted
by the Federal grand jury and the rate was withdrawn. Mobile complains
of loss of business because of discriminations in favor of New Orleans
on one side and Pensacola on the other. The Fort Wayne Commercial Club
complains of discrimination in rates, demurrage, switching, supply of
cars, etc. The lumber rate to Boston from points in West Virginia on the
Norfolk and Western is 29½ cents, while points on the B. & O. and
Chesapeake and Ohio in the same State and the same distance from Boston
have a rate of 23½ cents.[321] The Pennsylvania Railroad taking lumber
to points on the Long Branch Railroad made the rates by adding to the
New York rate an arbitrary charge of 5 cents a hundred lbs. if the
lumber came from Saginaw, Mich., but only 2 cents if the shipping point
was Buffalo; held an unlawful discrimination.[322]
Even so important a city as Philadelphia has had serious complaints to
make at times of the favoritism shown New York by sending many of the
best trains from Washington north through Philadelphia without running
into Broad Street Station, but stopping only at West Philadelphia, and
by arranging excursion tickets so that southern buyers would go to New
York instead of Philadelphia.[323]
In June, 1905, the New Haven and Hartford notified connecting lines that
it would not receive any further shipments of coal for delivery east of
the Connecticut River or north of Hartford after August 31. Such an
order constitutes a compound discrimination against certain localities
and a specific commodity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account