The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countriesParsons, Frank
History
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries
Parsons, Frank
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
The main points of the Commission’s Bill are: 1. That power be granted
the Commission, after full hearing, to fix the rate or practice to be
observed in the future in place of the rate or practice found by the
Commission to be unreasonable or unjust.[382] 2. That the Commission
shall have authority to prescribe the form in which railway books shall
be kept, with the right to examine such books at any and all times.[383]
3. That private car-lines, industrial railroads, import and export
rates, etc., shall be brought within the scope of the Commission’s
power. 4. That the time of notice of tariff changes shall be extended to
60 days, subject to modification in the discretion of the Commission,
and the Commission says: “We think that 60 days is not too long in the
great majority of cases, and that such length of notice would add
greatly to the stability of rates.” 5. That the Commission shall have
authority to order railways to continue through routes and joint rates
and to prescribe the divisions which the several carriers shall receive
in the distribution of those rates in case they fail to agree among
themselves. At present “carriers are under no legal obligations to
establish through routes or joint rates, and may at their pleasure
withdraw from such arrangements when they have been actually entered
into,” so that “if the Commission were to pronounce a joint rate
unreasonable and order a reduction of that rate and the carriers parties
to the rate should thereupon either cancel all joint arrangements, or,
as they might, cancel their joint rates upon the commodity in question,
the Commission would be practically powerless to enforce the reduced
rate. When it is considered that a large part of the most important
rates of this country are joint rates, it will be seen that the railways
have it in their discretion by this means to largely defeat the purpose
of the law.”[384]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account