The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries — John Shaqi
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countriesParsons, Frank
History
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries
Parsons, Frank
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
As a result of the play of these motives our railroad history is full of
unfair discriminations between persons, places, and industries in the
United States, and between domestic and foreign trade. The methods and
forms are many and have grown more numerous with each succeeding epoch,
but the predominant forms vary in the different strata. We still have
plenty of living specimens of the species that prevailed in earlier
periods, but the leading forms now are comparatively recent evolutions.
The history of discriminations would fill many volumes. The Hepburn
Committee (1879) appointed by the New York Legislature collected about
5000 cases of discrimination. It was shown to be a common thing for
railroads to give favored shippers discounts of 50, 60, 70, and even 80
percent from the regular rates. The special contracts involving favors
in force for one year on a single railroad, the New York Central, were
estimated at 6000. The United States Senate Committee of 1885, the
Congressional Committee of 1888, the Interstate Commerce Commission,
1887–1905, the United States Industrial Commission, 1900–1902, the
Wisconsin investigation in the fall of 1903, the United States Senate
Committee of 1905, the State railroad commissions, the courts, and other
investigating bodies have brought to light additional thousands of
discriminations. We shall select some examples illustrating various
methods of discrimination.
CHAPTER V.
THE EARLY YEARS, HEPBURN REPORT, ETC.
One of the discriminations most complained of in early years was the
charging of lower rates for a long haul than for a short haul on the
same line—less for the whole than for a part.
For example, the rate from New York to Ogden was $4.65 per hundred,
while $2.25 per hundred carried the same freight all the way from New
York to San Francisco. The railroads charged more if the car stopped
part way than if it went on to the Pacific,—more than twice as much, in
fact, for the part haul as for the full distance, so that the extra
charge for not hauling the car on from Ogden to Frisco was greater than
for hauling it the entire distance from ocean to ocean. They seemed to
be willing to take off half for the privilege of hauling the car another
1000 miles. These methods are still in practice.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account