The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countriesParsons, Frank
History
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries
Parsons, Frank
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
The present system, however, does not always give good service. In
April and May, 1905, for instance, hundreds and hundreds of cars of
strawberries rotted at the stations in North Carolina for want of
cars. The Armour Car-Line could not, or at least did not supply the
needed cars, and as they have an exclusive contract with the Atlantic
Coast Line no other cars are in the field. At one station only 4 cars
were furnished in two days and 125 carloads of berries were left on
the platform and the ground to spoil. The loss this season to the
truck growers of this one section from insufficient car service is
estimated at $600,000. (Sen. Com., 1905, pp. 2596, 2619.)
Footnote 263:
Some railroads have refrigerator lines of their own; the Pennsylvania,
for example, and the Vanderbilts, the Goulds, the Santa Fe, the
Northern Pacific, the Great Northern, etc., but they carry the private
refrigerators also. Packers and other shippers owning cars insist on
sending their goods in their own cars, and making the roads pay
mileage. If the road refuses, the freight goes by some other line.
“They compel us to take it in their cars and pay them for the use of
them while our own cars stand on the side track, or else some other
road gets the business.” (Testimony of James J. Hill, Sen. Com., 1905,
pp. 1504–1505.)
Footnote 264:
See above, pp. 57, 58.
Footnote 265:
This mileage rebate system began long ago. Way back in the seventies
the Erie and other roads allowed the Standard Oil Company to put tank
cars on their tracks and paid it a mileage sufficient to pay back the
values of the cars in less than 3 years.
Footnote 266:
The 1 cent rate applies to 15 to 25 percent of the total mileage of
the cars and the ¾ cent rate to the remaining mileage. (Bureau of
Commerce Rep. on Beef Industry, March, 1905, p. 273.)
Footnote 267:
Evidence in I. C. C. Hearings on private car-lines, April 28, 1904, p.
8. The Beef Trust report of the Bureau of Commerce, 1905, presents
some conflicting evidence and sums up the case with a conservative
estimate which places the average daily run of _all_ the cars owned by
Armour and his associates and used in the beef business at 90 to 100
miles. In the same report, however, the refrigerator cars of the
National Car-Line Company, and of the Provision Dealers’ Dispatch are
reported as running 300 miles a day, and the cars of Swift and Company
are estimated to make 373 miles a day in Iowa. (“Report of
Commissioner of Corporations on the Beef Industry.” March 3, 1905, pp.
274–281.)
Footnote 268:
I. C. C. Rep. 1903, p. 23.
Footnote 269:
National Congress of Railway Commissioners, 1892, statement of the
Committee on Private Cars, p. 52 _et seq._ The Lackawanna Line Stock
Express Co., for example, netted 50 percent a year, or $343 per car.
See also 4 I. C. C. Decis. 630.
Footnote 270:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account