The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countriesParsons, Frank
History
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries
Parsons, Frank
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
The stringent provision for imprisonment did not prove any more
effective than the milder law that preceded it, less so apparently, for
the following years were flooded with unfair discriminations.[41]
CHAPTER VIII.
EFFECTS OF THE INTERSTATE ACT.
An investigation by the Commission in May, 1889, concerning passes, and
covering 27 railroads, showed that passes were issued freely to
expressmen, telegraph men, press men, managers of excursions, attorneys,
persons contracting with the railroads in consideration of advertising,
shippers, members of legislative bodies, United States, State, and
municipal officers, officials of steamship and steamboat lines, etc.
These passes were chiefly limited to a State, but to some extent were
good for interstate journeys. Of State passes the larger numbers were
issued to members of legislatures and drovers; “complimentaries” came
next, with United States and municipal officers, newspapermen, and
shippers, in the order named.
The Commission said: “The Interstate Commerce Act was intended to end
all the abuses attending free transportation of persons, and to a
considerable extent it has done so. But very largely the carriers,
especially the strong systems, where the abuse has been greatest, have
tried to avoid the law by falling back on State protection, and issuing
passes within the limits of each State. Three of the large railroad
systems, when called on by the Commission to make an exhibit of the
passes issued by them, declined to do so on the ground that the passes
were limited to the bounds of the State, and therefore not within the
jurisdiction of the Commission. If the New York Central and Pennsylvania
railroads can thus issue passes at discretion it is impracticable to
enforce the laws against their competitors.”[42] By issuing to a favored
individual a pass good in Pennsylvania, another good in Ohio, another
for Indiana, another for Illinois, etc., the Pennsylvania Railroad can
give the beneficiary as full freedom of its lines as any interstate pass
could give.
Pass making went merrily on all over the country, with a complaint now
and then to let in the light, but no effective crusade against the
disease. The Boston and Maine, for example, issued passes in Maine, New
Hampshire, Vermont, and Massachusetts, to public officers of the States
and the United States, members of legislatures, and railroad
commissions, agents of ice companies, milk contractors, newspaper men,
etc.[43] The Commission recorded its protest and declared that the
“similar circumstances” of the Interstate Act do not relate to the
social or official position of the passenger;[44] but the pestilence is
beyond the reach of the national board, and after eighteen years of
Federal prohibition our railroad business is still honeycombed with
political and commercial passes, as we have already seen in the second
chapter of this book.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account