The hell bombLaurence, William L. (William Leonard)
Philosophy
The hell bomb
Laurence, William L. (William Leonard)
Hydrogen bomb
As this is being written, the Korean war is just one month old. By the
time these lines appear in print we may know whether the naked Communist
aggression on the Republic of South Korea was an episode, a prelude, or
the first act of World War III. But whatever history records, the first
flash of the Communist guns, supplied by the Kremlin, has revealed to
the free world at last the face of the enemy in all its hideousness. It
brought the first phase of the so-called cold war to a definite end. It
aroused freedom-loving peoples everywhere and put them on the alert. It
served as a powerful headlight in the night, revealing many dangerous
curves on the road ahead. It has given the United Nations its first
great opportunity to display its vitality for all the world to see.
Among other things, the flash of the North Korean guns has illumined for
us more clearly than ever before the path we must follow in our policy
on atomic weapons, both the A-bomb and the H-bomb. It has revealed the
extreme danger lurking in any plan to outlaw production and use of
atomic weapons in a world constantly threatened by a savage
dictatorship, ready to pounce on it at the first sign of weakening in
its armor.
The flash of the Red guns, in the first place, made it clear to free men
everywhere that to renounce our right to the production of atomic
weapons as potentially the greatest deterrents against the further
spread of Communist aggression, and as the most powerful defenders of
the spiritual and moral values without which our way of life would
become meaningless, would allow the Red Army to overrun what remains of
the free world. Such a move on our part, for the present and the
foreseeable future, may herald the last appearance of free men on the
stage of history. It would be, as the Goncourt brothers feared, “closing
time, gentlemen!”
In addition to warning us what we must not do, the Red guns also gave
warning of a more positive nature. They warned us to make all haste in
the construction of the hydrogen bomb, to get it ready as soon as
possible, against the eventuality that Russia may decide it would be to
her advantage to precipitate World War III before our H-bomb is ready.
Instead of the estimated pre-Korea time-table of three years, it now
becomes a vital necessity for us to complete our H-bomb, and facilities
for its production at a speedy rate, within a year. And if the history
of our development of the A-bomb may serve as an example, it almost
becomes a certainty that we shall do so. While we may not announce it to
the world, we have good reason to expect that the first H-bomb will be
ready for testing sometime in 1951, possibly in early summer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account