The hell bombLaurence, William L. (William Leonard)
Philosophy
The hell bomb
Laurence, William L. (William Leonard)
Hydrogen bomb
The one and only major problem to be solved is how to assemble into an
efficient H-bomb the materials we already have at hand or will have in a
few months. Here, too, we are much farther advanced than we were at the
time we decided to build the A-bomb, as we are not called upon to start
from scratch. For whereas in the early days of the A-bomb development
scientists were doubtful whether it could be made at all and were
actually hoping that their investigations would prove that it was
impossible, for the Nazis as well as for us, no such doubts seem to
exist in the minds of those most intimately associated with the problem.
On this score we have had more than hints from a number of those in the
know, among them Senator McMahon. “The scientists,” he said in a
historic address to the United States Senate on February 2, 1950, “feel
more confident that this most horrible of armaments [the hydrogen bomb]
can be developed successfully than they felt in 1940 when the original
bomb was under consideration. The hydrogen development will be cheaper
than its uranium forerunner. Theoretically, it is without limit in
destructive capacity. A weapon made of such material would destroy any
military or other target, including the largest city on earth.”
What is this confidence based on? Scientists are a very conservative
lot, not given to jumping to conclusions without experimental evidence
on which to base them. I remember well the agonizing hours preceding the
test of the first A-bomb in New Mexico, when everyone present,
particularly the intellectual hierarchy that was most responsible, was
beset by grave doubts whether the A-bomb would go off at all, and if it
did, whether it would live up to expectations or turn out to be no more
than an improved blockbuster. Very few, if any, felt confident that it
would be as good as it finally turned out to be. For example, in a pool
in which everyone bet a dollar to guess the ultimate power of the bomb
in terms of TNT, Dr. Oppenheimer placed his bet on 300 tons. This makes
it evident that the scientists were not very confident even as late as
1945, up to the very last minute, when “the brain child of many minds
came forth in physical shape and performed as it was supposed to do.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account