All nations except the Soviet Union and her satellites “put world security first, and are prepared to accept innovations in traditional concepts of international cooperation, national sovereignty, and economic organization where these are necessary for security. The government of the U.S.S.R. puts its sovereignty first and is unwilling to accept measures which may impinge upon or interfere with its rigid exercise of unimpeded state sovereignty.” This basic variance in the objectives of the Soviet Union and the other members of the United Nations is mirrored in the majority and minority control proposals. The specific differences in the two plans may be summarized as follows: INTERNATIONAL INSPECTION _United Nations._—Complete and continuing inspection by international personnel, including aerial and ground surveys, and inspection of atomic facilities. _Soviet Union._—Periodic inspection of declared plants. Special investigations when there exist “grounds for suspicion”—not that the control agreement has been violated—but that the convention outlawing atomic weapons has been violated. (This could mean that only if a nation were subjected to surprise atomic attack would the necessary “grounds for suspicion” enter into existence.) INTERNATIONAL OWNERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT _United Nations._—International ownership or management of dangerous facilities and international ownership of source materials and their fissionable derivatives—in order to prevent diversion of such material from existing plants. _Soviet Union._—Complete opposition to international ownership or management provisions. STRATEGIC BALANCE (QUOTAS) _United Nations._—National quotas to be incorporated into international control treaty. _Soviet Union._—Sees in quotas an instrument for “American domination.” SANCTIONS _United Nations._—No veto to protect those who violate stipulated provisions of international agreement. _Soviet Union._—All decisions require unanimous consent of permanent members of Security Council. The permanent members of the UNAEC have summarized the differences between the Soviet plan and the world plan in the following fashion: “The Soviet Union proposes that nations should continue to own explosive atomic materials. “The other five Powers feel that under such conditions there would be no effective protection against the sudden use of these materials as atomic weapons. “The Soviet Union proposes that nations continue, as at present, to own, operate, and manage facilities making or using dangerous quantities of such materials. “The other five Powers believe that, under such conditions, it would be impossible to detect or prevent the diversion of such materials for use in atomic weapons.