The hell bombLaurence, William L. (William Leonard)
Philosophy
The hell bomb
Laurence, William L. (William Leonard)
Hydrogen bomb
In the meanwhile, the Soviet Union had served notice of what appeared to
be a significant change in its position. In a draft resolution dated
September 25, 1948, the Soviets proposed—
To elaborate draft conventions for the banning of atomic weapons and
conventions for the establishment of international effective control
over atomic energy, taking into account that the convention for the
banning of atomic weapons and the convention for the establishment of
international control over atomic energy must be signed and
implemented and entered into force _simultaneously_.
It was the last word of this resolution that marked a change in the
U.S.S.R. stand. Previously, the Soviets had demanded that atomic weapons
production be prohibited and stock piles be destroyed _before_ a control
plan was discussed.
Nonetheless, the new Soviet proposal gave no indication that the Soviets
would accede to what the majority regard as an _effective_ control plan.
Furthermore, the proposal for simultaneous prohibition and control was
considered to be physically impossible to implement. “The development of
atomic energy is the world’s newest industry, and already is one of the
most complicated. It would not be reasonable to assume that any
effective system of control could be introduced and enforced overnight.
Control and prohibition must, therefore, go into effect over a period of
time and by a series of stages.”
The record of negotiations from the fall of 1948 to the present is
largely one of inaction.
On September 23, 1949, President Truman announced that an atomic
explosion had occurred in the Soviet Union. One month later, the
sponsoring powers of the UNAEC revealed that the consultations between
them “had not yet succeeded in bringing about agreement between the
U.S.S.R. and the other five powers.”
Despite this, the General Assembly, on November 23, 1949, asked that the
permanent members of the Commission continue their consultations and
keep the Commission and the General Assembly informed of their work. On
the same day, Vishinsky revealed that the Soviets no longer entertained
favorably the principle of quotas.
On January 19, 1950, consultations came to an end when the Soviet Union
withdrew from the discussions over the question of recognition of the
Chinese Government.
C
THE ATOMIC IMPASSE
Regarded in fundamental terms, the deadlock in international control
negotiations reflects diametrically opposed notions of the
responsibilities of individual nations in a world of atomic energy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account