The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United States — John Shaqi
The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United StatesEarly, Jubal Anderson
History
The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United States
Early, Jubal Anderson
Slavery -- United States; United States -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865
This decision of Lord Mansfield was one of those acts of judicial
legislation for which he was so famous, and it was not the law. Quite as
able judges as himself had previously decided the validity and legality
of slavery even in England, and Lord Stowell, as able a judge and purer
man than he was, subsequently ruled very differently from the decision in
the Somerset case. England had no use for slaves at home, as her toiling
millions supplied every demand for labor or service. Had it been to her
interest to have had African slaves within her own limits, her pure air
would have accommodated itself to their constitution. She never sacrificed
her material interests to her philanthropy. Notwithstanding the decision
of Lord Mansfield, it was twenty-five years before the prime minister of
England (the younger Pitt) ventured to go even so far, as to bring in a
bill to mitigate the horrors "of the Middle Passage," by limiting the
number of slaves to be taken on board a ship--it was forty-five years
before another prime minister ventured to advocate the abolition of the
slave trade, and seventy-one years before slavery was abolished in the
limited slave colonies left to England after the American Revolution, and
that was not done until this small interest was so far overshadowed by
other interests as to make it of no importance to her.
CHAPTER III
=Legislation on the Question of State Establishment=
In order to understand the status of the slave trade and slavery in the
United States after their independence was achieved, it is necessary to
glance at the progress of the Revolution and the adoption of the new form
of government after its close.
In 1774, the contest between the mother country and the English Colonies
of North America approached a crisis, and the first Continental Congress
of delegates from the thirteen colonies assembled at Philadelphia on
the 5th of September of that year. Fifteen articles, as the basis of an
"American Association," were adopted and signed on the 20th of October,
in which, among other things the slave trade was denounced, and entire
abstinence from it and from any trade with those engaged in it, was
enjoined. This had been preceded by the Virginia resolution on the same
subject more than two months, but the war which ensued put an end to the
trade during its continuance, much more effectually than any resolutions
or laws could have done.
The "Declaration of Colonial Rights" adopted by this Congress enumerated
eleven acts of Parliament as having been passed in derogation of the
rights of the colonies since the accession of George III to the throne,
to-wit:
1. "The Sugar Act."--This act was a modification of the "Molasses Act," by
which the duties on molasses and sugar were lowered and a few unimportant
articles were added to the list of those taxed.
2. "The Stamp Act."--This act never had been executed and had been
repealed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account