The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United StatesEarly, Jubal Anderson
History
The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United States
Early, Jubal Anderson
Slavery -- United States; United States -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865
Delaware, as before stated, by her constitution adopted in 1776,
prohibited the further introduction of slaves.
Virginia did the same thing by her law adopted in 1778.
Pennsylvania, whose legislature had ceased to be under the control of the
Quakers, as they refused to take part in the Revolution, adopted a law in
1780, prohibiting the further introduction of slaves and giving freedom to
all children of slave mothers born after its passage.
Massachusetts incorporated a declaration in her bill of rights adopted in
1780, that "all men are born free and equal," and under that declaration
it was decided by the Supreme Court of that State in 1783, that slavery
was prohibited. It cannot be claimed that this declaration was intended
to have that effect, for if such had been the case it would not have been
left to judicial interpretation to give it, but an express provision
would have been incorporated on the subject. It was a species of judicial
legislation which was submitted to because no important interest was at
stake. There were a little over 6,000 slaves in Massachusetts at the
date of the Revolution, distributed in small numbers among the owners
and employed mostly as household servants. The population was largely
engaged in commerce, fisheries, manufactures, etc., and the character
of the agriculture was not at all adapted to slave labor. Nothing of
consequence therefore, was to be gained by contesting the validity of the
decision, and it was the easiest way of getting rid of the matter by quiet
submission.
New Hampshire adopted a similar clause in her second constitution in 1783,
and under that it was held that freedom was guaranteed to all children
born after its adoption.
Maryland adopted in 1783, laws in regard to the introduction of slaves
similar to those of Virginia.
Connecticut and Rhode Island, in 1784, adopted laws on the subject of
slavery similar to those of Pennsylvania.
The effect of these laws and decisions was to put an end to the slave
trade in all of the states but North and South Carolina and Georgia; to
abolish it in Massachusetts and provide for its gradual extinction in New
Hampshire, Rhode Island, Connecticut and Pennsylvania, while it still
remained as before in the other states. It has been alleged, and probably
was true, that a large number of the slaves in the northern states were
carried to the South and sold there, to avoid the operation of the
emancipation measures which were initiated. This allegation receives very
strong confirmation from a comparison of the free colonies' population
at the north at different periods, with the number of slaves known to be
there at the date of the institution of emancipation measures, when taken
in connection with the increase to that colored population, from freed
slaves and runaways from the South.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account