The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United StatesEarly, Jubal Anderson
History
The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United States
Early, Jubal Anderson
Slavery -- United States; United States -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865
In the year 1713, by the treaty of Utrecht, the _Assiento_, a contract
originally entered into by the Spanish government with a company of French
merchants for a monopoly by the latter of the trade in slaves to Spanish
America, was assigned to the South Sea Company. By the terms of this
contract 4,800 negro slaves were to be furnished to the Spanish colonies
annually for thirty years, the company being privileged to introduce as
many more as could be sold.
In this company Queen Anne and the King of Spain became stockholders, as
did a large portion of the nobility, gentry, churchmen, and merchants
of England. England thus sought a monopoly of the entire slave trade,
at least so far as her own and the Spanish colonies were concerned. The
exclusive privileges granted to the Royal African Company having expired,
in the year 1750 the British Government undertook to maintain the forts
and factories on the African coast at its own expense, and the slave trade
was thrown open to free competition on the part of its citizens. A great
increase of the trade now took place, and England had become the leading
nation in that trade, which was carried on chiefly from the ports of
Bristol and Liverpool, but other ports including that of London shared in
it--the West Indies furnishing the principal market, but a considerable
number were also introduced into the colonies of North America.
In the meantime the Puritan settlers in New England, under the allurements
of the high profits of the trade, had been tempted to engage in it from
the time of the earliest settlements there, which they did by evading
the monopolies and restrictions in favor of English merchants, and as
New England rum was mainly used in the traffic, by the Puritans, the
Parliament of Great Britain had, at the instance of English merchants,
passed an act, called the "Molasses Act" imposing duties on molasses,
sugar and rum imported into the colonies from the French and Dutch West
Indies, for the purpose of preventing interference with the English trade
in slaves.
Numerous acts of the colonial legislatures imposing duties on the
importation of slaves, had also been vetoed or repealed by royal
proclamation, because they were regarded and styled "impediments to
British commerce not to be favoured," and all such acts continued to be
vetoed and repealed down to the time of the American Revolution, except
in the solitary case of Virginia, when, after repeated acts imposing such
duties had been vetoed or repealed, privilege was finally given to the
colonial legislature in 1734, to impose a duty to be paid by the colonial
_purchaser_ and not the English _seller_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account