The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United StatesEarly, Jubal Anderson
History
The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United States
Early, Jubal Anderson
Slavery -- United States; United States -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865
It has been said that the Confederate states began the war by firing upon
Fort Sumter. If those states had the right to withdraw from the Union and
the United States had no right to resist or coerce them then the attempt
to maintain a garrisoned fort in one of the most important harbors of the
Confederacy, was an act of war. This had, nevertheless, been patiently
borne with, for nearly three months after the secession of South Carolina,
in whose principal harbor the Fort was situated, and it was only when
the Government of the United States had given notice of its intention
to supply Fort Sumter "peaceably, if possible, otherwise by force,"
and the vessels for that purpose had appeared off the harbor, that the
attack began. The commissioners sent to Washington to effect a peaceable
settlement of all questions had then been denied an audience, and informed
that the authorities at Washington would hold no intercourse with them.
The war was thus inevitable, and the Federal authorities were quietly
preparing for it, in order to entrap the border states. The threat to
supply Fort Sumter indicated a purpose of war; was then the Confederate
Government to wait until the measures of the Government at Washington
had been so completely taken that the former would find itself helpless
in the hands of its enemy? The port of Charleston was necessary to it
as an inlet for obtaining supplies and arms for its defence, was it
then to allow the port, which could block the entrance to that harbor,
to be placed in a condition to render the blockade complete, the harbor
worthless and Charleston untenable?
There can be no question of the right of the Confederate Government to
force a surrender of the fort, which had been refused, and that it was
fully warranted in pursuing the course it did. I must confess that, at
the time, I deeply deplored and condemned the attack on Fort Sumter, on
the score of policy, because I regarded the threat of the Washington
Government as designed to provoke a commencement of the conflict by the
firing of the first shot, and not intended really to be carried into
effect. It is now manifest that war had already been resolved upon, and
the firing of the first gun on Fort Sumter was not its commencement. The
war was begun by the attempt to hold the forts in the Confederate harbors.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account