The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United StatesEarly, Jubal Anderson
History
The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United States
Early, Jubal Anderson
Slavery -- United States; United States -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865
It has been alleged that the Southern States had previously controlled
the policy of the government, and that they seceded because they had now
lost that power. There had never been a president elected from any of
the Cotton States, which established the Confederate Government except
from Louisiana, of which state General Taylor was a nominal resident, but
really a native of Virginia, and an officer in the army, and he lived
but a little over a year after his inauguration. These Cotton States had
furnished comparatively few cabinet ministers, and they had in the main
been opposed to the policy pursued by the government in regard to the
most important branches of legislation, such as internal improvements,
the public lands, tariff, etc. Their leading interest, the culture of
cotton, had received no fostering care whatever from the government, and
South Carolina had been complaining for more than thirty years that her
interest had been sacrificed to Northern cupidity by high tariff and at
one time she had taken steps to nullify the laws on that subject. In no
sense could the state which initiated secession, be said to be actuated by
disappointment at the loss of Federal power.
It is true that they had lost the power to protect themselves in the
Union, as the Constitution had been so flagrantly violated and were now
threatened with submission--and for this they seceded.
The state of Virginia had given four of the Southern presidents to the
Union, and Tennessee the other two. Washington had been the unanimous
choice of all of the states; Jefferson, Madison and Munroe had been
national men in their policy and had received the support of a large
majority of the Northern vote; Munroe being accepted without opposition
at his last election and receiving all of the votes, North and South, but
one northern electoral vote. Munroe was the last Virginian elected or
nominated as President. It is true Tyler had succeeded to the office by
the death of Harrison, but he had not received the vote of Virginia even
as vice-president.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account