The hero of the Filipinos : $b The story of José Rizal, poet, patriot and martyrRussell, Charles Edward
History
The hero of the Filipinos : $b The story of José Rizal, poet, patriot and martyr
Russell, Charles Edward
Rizal, José, 1861-1896
Here was a revelation to shake the towers of accepted doctrine. In the
light of it how great (and how hideous!) was the wrong done to the
people of the Philippines! The pretense upon which Spain ruled in this
iron fashion, with so much cruelty and dishonesty, was (in effect) that
in the cells of the brains and in the corpuscles of the blood of these
people some undefined and mysterious essence was lacking, and for want
of this they were incapable of ruling themselves or even of taking a
place among the other children of earth. Being put to the test, no such
lack appeared, but only aptitude, mental health, mental vigor, equal at
least to those of the white man. The European ruled, then, because he
had a larger share of the brute in him, because he had a sensual
ambition to rule, because his taste found pleasure in humiliating and
exploiting others, because he had a tougher conscience, and because
luck had been on his side. Of any essential, irradicable, structural
difference between race and race there was not an indication. What the
Asiatic really lacked was opportunity, not intellect; and liberty, not
character.
He came to these conclusions without haste, because his was a mind that
worked deliberately and over stretched-out periods of observation. He
has left a record of them: of the time when they caused him to believe
that the Malayan mind must really be better than the Caucasian; of his
final conviction that between mind and mind there is no racial
distinction with which reasoning men will bother themselves; that all
the children of mother earth under the same conditions will average
about the same results. In the end he came to discard the whole theory
of races; to his mind it was nothing but the manufacture of prejudice,
ignorance, or profit-mongering. Mankind he saw not separated by
perpendicular lines into races but by horizontal lines into strata.
[35] Everywhere some groups of men, favored by conditions, by liberty
first of all, by institutions, by opportunity, had climbed to higher
strata; everywhere other groups of men less fortunate as to conditions,
having less liberty, worse institutions, and narrower opportunity,
remained still in the lower strata. But everywhere it was, first of
all, conditions that determined whether men should climb or remain, and
not blood nor the color of skin nor the texture of hair.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account