The Heroic Record of the British Navy: A Short History of the Naval War, 1914-1918Bashford, H. H. (Henry Howarth), Sir
History
The Heroic Record of the British Navy: A Short History of the Naval War, 1914-1918
Bashford, H. H. (Henry Howarth), Sir
Great Britain. Royal Navy; World War, 1914-1918 -- Naval operations
Moreover, there was another factor that forbade the question being
summarily dismissed as technically impossible. For, while it was true
that hitherto the bulk of naval opinion had been adverse to the use of
ships in a duel with forts, and while the results of purely naval
action against such defenses as those, for example, as Port Arthur, had
not been encouraging, it was realized that in the present war--as
regarded the land, at any rate--the value of fortresses had fallen very
considerably. Hammered by modern artillery, the world had seen such
strongholds as those of Liège, Namur, and Antwerp, crumbling to pieces
in a few hours, and theories were once more in the melting-pot. Since
the outbreak of war, too, there had been added to the navy, in the
15-inch guns of the _Queen Elizabeth_, the most powerful marine
artillery that the world had yet seen. Could the navy then tackle the
problem alone?
With all this in his mind, on January 3d, the day that we had pledged
ourselves to do our best, Mr. Churchill telegraphed to Vice-Admiral
Carden, then our senior officer in the Mediterranean, asking him if he
thought it practicable to force the Dardanelles by the use of ships
alone, assuming that only our {114} older battleships would be
employed, with a suitable escort of mine-sweepers and bumpers, and
suggesting that the importance of a successful result would justify
severe loss. Two days later, Vice-Admiral Carden replied that he did
not think the Dardanelles could be rushed, but that they might be
forced by extended operations with a large number of ships. On January
6th, Mr. Churchill invited Admiral Carden to forward detailed
particulars as to the force required, the manner of its employment, and
the results to be expected from it. Five days afterward, Admiral
Carden replied that five operations were possible, namely, the
destruction of the defenses at the entrance to the Dardanelles; action
inside the Straits so as to clear the defenses up to and including
Point Kephez Battery; the destruction of the defenses of the Narrows;
the sweeping of a clear channel through the minefields and advance
through the Narrows, followed by a reduction of the forts farther up,
and an entrance into the Sea of Marmora. What Admiral Carden
suggested, in fact, was a methodical invasion with a systematic
demolition of the fortifications--an operation estimated to require at
least a month for its performance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account