The Heroic Record of the British Navy: A Short History of the Naval War, 1914-1918Bashford, H. H. (Henry Howarth), Sir
History
The Heroic Record of the British Navy: A Short History of the Naval War, 1914-1918
Bashford, H. H. (Henry Howarth), Sir
Great Britain. Royal Navy; World War, 1914-1918 -- Naval operations
Meanwhile at home, the lack of unanimity, of whole-hearted enthusiasm
in the necessary team-work, and, more than this, of a detailed
conception of what was actually intended were beginning to bear their
fruits. Thus it had been decided, in the first place--and this had
greatly influenced both Lord Fisher and Sir Arthur Wilson--that, if the
naval attack were to become unpromising, it would be {125} broken off
and its losses cut. That had also been Lord Kitchener's view, but, on
February 24th, he stated, at a meeting of the War Council, that if the
Fleet could not get through without help, the army would have to come
to its aid. By Mr. Churchill that had evidently long been accepted,
and preparations, as we have seen, were well under way. Transports had
been collected for the despatch of the 29th Division, and it was hoped
that it would begin to sail on the 22nd. Two days before, however,
Lord Kitchener had decided, for reasons doubtless important, but
without consulting his colleagues, that this Division could not be
spared, and he had countermanded the transports.
Against this reversal of policy at a critical moment Mr. Churchill made
the strongest protest, and said that he must disclaim all
responsibility if disaster occurred in Turkey owing to the
insufficiency of troops. Lord Kitchener for his part asserted that the
forces in Egypt, on the spot, and on the way there were at present
quite adequate, and that the 29th Division was not then essential to
success--a view that the War Council supported, the 29th Division being
detained in England.
While now determined that the affair should not be broken off, Lord
Kitchener still believed that the navy would need but little military
help, and, on February 24th, he wired to Sir John Maxwell, then
commanding the forces in Egypt, and General Birdwood, who was to
command the Australian and New Zealand contingent on the Peninsula,
that it was not intended to land parties on Gallipoli, except {126}
under cover of the naval guns, to help in the total demolition of the
forts, when the ships should get to close quarters.
Two days later, Sir John Maxwell replied that, in the opinion of a
French officer, formerly military attaché at Constantinople, a military
expedition was essential to the opening of the passage for the Allied
Fleets; that a landing would be extremely hazardous; and that the
Peninsula was very strongly organized for defence. Nevertheless Lord
Kitchener retained his opinion and telegraphed the same evening to
General Birdwood, that as far as could be seen, till the passage was
actually secured, he would be limited to such minor operations as the
final destruction of the batteries, though it was possible that he
might have to organize expeditions to deal with inland concealed
howitzers such as the ships could not destroy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account