The Hindoos as They Are: A Description of the Manners, Customs and the Inner Life of Hindoo Society in BengalSivachandra Vasu
Religion
The Hindoos as They Are: A Description of the Manners, Customs and the Inner Life of Hindoo Society in Bengal
Sivachandra Vasu
Hindus; India -- Social life and customs; Women -- India
[69] It would not be out of place to observe here that liberal Hindoos
as a body are not beef-eaters as is vulgarly supposed. They are content
with fowls, goat, sheep and fish. About forty years ago before the
Calcutta University was founded, the late Baboo Isser Chunder Goopto,
the editor of _Pravakur_, a vernacular news paper, very cleverly hit off
and satirised in popular ballads the then growing desire of the young
Hindoo reformers to adopt a European style of eating. He commenced with
Rammohun Roy--the pioneer of Hindoo reformation--and thus sarcastically
described his public career. Addressing _Saraswattee_ the Hindoo goddess
of learning, he thus laments: "Oh goddess! in vain have you established
schools in Calcutta, look at the end of that Roy (Rammohun Roy);
profound learning had wafted him over the waters to a distant region
(England), and never brought him back again." As regards the young
alumni, he makes a wife thus accost her husband: "_Pran, Pran_, my
heart, my heart, you go to society and lectures every day, and when the
Examination is held at the Town Hall you get prizes, heaps and heaps of
books you read and always remain outside. Is it written in the books
that you should never touch the body of a female? What sort of a
_gooroo_ (master) is your Sahib? he is a regular _garu_ (bull) if he
give you such lessons. You dislike _loochee_ and _munda_ (Hindoo
sweetmeats) but you get _gunda_ and _gunda_ of fowl eggs and satisfy
your hunger, and for you all there is an end of cows and calves." But
this is an exaggeration about the eating of beef by the educated
Hindoos. Except a few medical students, who have, in a great measure,
overcome their prejudices by the constant handling of dead bodies, the
rest still feel a sort of natural repugnance to eating beef. This is,
perhaps, the effect of early impressions produced by the religious
veneration in which a cow is held among the Hindoos. "The superstitious
reverence," says an eminent writer, "for the ox, points doubtless to a
period when that useful animal was first naturalized in India and
protected by a law for its preservation and encouragement, which, now
that the original intention is lost sight of in the lapse of ages, has
invested the cattle with a religious character, and, indeed, it is not
200 years since the Emperor Jehangir was obliged once to prohibit the
slaughter of kine for a term of years, as a measure absolutely required
to prevent the ruin of agriculture." It is a striking fact that that
loathsome disease, leprosy, is very common among the lower orders of
Mussulmans who use this meat freely. Perhaps it is more suited to the
inhabitants of milder regions than those of a tropical climate.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account