The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 01 : $b Prolegomena; Egypt, Mesopotamia — John Shaqi
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 01 : $b Prolegomena; Egypt, Mesopotamia
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 01 : $b Prolegomena; Egypt, Mesopotamia
World history
Such a position as this, assumed by one of the most minute searchers
among modern historians, is highly interesting as illustrative of a
reactionary tendency which will probably characterise the historical
work of the near future. Hair-splitting analysis having been carried
to its limits of refinement, there will probably come a reaction in
the direction of a more comprehensive study of historical events
in their wider relations. The work of the specialist, after all,
is really important only when it furnishes material for wider
generalisations. All minute workers in the fields of biology, geology,
and the allied sciences, in the first half of the nineteenth century
were unconsciously gathering material which, interesting in itself,
became of real importance chiefly in so far as it ultimately aided in
elucidating the great generalisation of Darwin. Perhaps the minute
historians of to-day are in similar position.
The special worker, imbued with enthusiasm for his subject, is apt
to forget the real insignificance of his labours. Entire epochs are
dominated by the idea of microscopic research, and the workers even
come to suppose that microscopic analysis is in itself an end; whereas,
rightly considered, it is only the means to an end. We are just passing
through such an epoch as regards historical investigation. But, as just
suggested, it seems probable that we are approaching a new epoch when
the work of the specialist will be subordinated to its true purpose,
while at the same time proving its real value as a means to the proper
end of historical studies--the comprehension of the world-historical
relations of events.
CHAPTER II
MATERIALS FOR THE WRITING OF HISTORY
It is obvious that the materials for the writing of history consist
for the most part of written records. It is true that all manner of
monuments, including the ruins of buried cities, remains of ancient
walls and highways, and all other traces of a former civilisation,
must be allotted their share as records to guide the investigator in
his attempt to reconstruct past conditions. But for anything like a
definite presentation of the events of by-gone days, it is absolutely
essential, as Sir George Cornewall Lewis pointed out in great detail,
to have access to contemporary written records, either at first hand,
or through the medium of copyists, in case the original records
themselves have been destroyed. Lewis reached the conclusion, as the
result of his exhaustive examination of the credibility of early Roman
history, that a tradition of a past event is hardly transmitted orally
from generation to generation with anything like accuracy of detail for
more than a century.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account