The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 01 : $b Prolegomena; Egypt, Mesopotamia — John Shaqi
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 01 : $b Prolegomena; Egypt, Mesopotamia
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 01 : $b Prolegomena; Egypt, Mesopotamia
World history
It is speaking well within bounds to
assert that seldom before has so varied an exposition of cosmopolitan
thought been collected in a single work.
But these excerpts are not given as random references crowded
into footnotes or appendices; they are woven into the text of the
consecutive story of world history so that they themselves constitute
the bulk of that story. Thus the history of Germany is mainly told in
the words of German writers, that of France in the words of French
historians. To avoid the prejudiced national view of history, however,
the story of a nation thus told by the native historian is always
subject to the corrective views of foreigners. Thus we gain both the
sympathetic and the critical points of view. When the authorities are
not agreed as to any important fact of history, or where there are
important differences of opinion in estimating the influence of a great
event or the real status of a famous character, reliance is not placed
upon the estimate of a single historian, but counterviews are quoted,
even though they may be directly contradictory, each, of course, being
ascribed to its proper source.
To give unity to these various views and to weld the entire mass of
matter into a consistent and comprehensive history of the world,
original editorial passages are everywhere freely introduced as a
part of the main narrative, forming indeed the warp of the whole, and
serving to elucidate and harmonise the views of the authorities quoted.
A feature of the original editorial matter is that it comprises, first
and last, critical estimates of the work of important historians
of every age, informing the reader as to the status--even to the
particular prejudice and bias--of the authority he is asked to consult.
Thus the novice is everywhere placed somewhat on a par with the special
student in his estimate of the authorities. Where conflicting views
are quoted of nominally equal authority, the reader is given data on
which to base an intelligent personal opinion as to the probabilities.
Moreover, elaborate additional bibliographies of works that may
advantageously be consulted are everywhere given, and these in the
aggregate constitute such a critical bibliography of the entire range
of historical compositions as cannot fail to interest even the general
reader.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account