The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia — John Shaqi
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
World history
The first of these facts is recorded in the famous “Moabite Stone,”
which tells how Omri afflicted Moab and took possession of the land of
Medeba, and how Israel dwelt therein, during his days, and half his
son’s days--forty years. The second, if correctly reported, is equally
interesting; for Omri’s predecessors, and Omri himself for the first
six years of his reign, held their court at Tirzah, which appears to
have been a strong city in the Negeb. If Omri really built the northern
Shimron, he not improbably named it after a city called Shimron in
the Negeb, not far from Beth-el. The resolution to place his capital
in central Palestine, if it be a fact, was a most judicious one,
considering the increasing danger from Assyria and from the northern
Aram. Perhaps, some day, the spade of the excavator may remove the
slight doubt which seems to exist on this point.
HEBREW RELATIONS WITH ASSYRIA AND ARAM
The misfortune is that the fragments of Hebrew historical tradition,
critically regarded, tell us very little that can be trusted respecting
the contact of the northern Israelites with these two powers at this
period. Shalmaneser II tells us in an inscription that (in 854 B.C.)
he was victorious at Qarqar, near Hamath, over a league of kings,
the first of whom was Dad-idri, or Bir-idri, of Damascus, the second
Irkhulina of Hamath, and the third Akhabbu of Israel (?). Of this
important fact not a hint is given in 1 Kings; indeed, the Hebrew
account of the last campaign of Ahab is not strictly reconcilable with
the Assyrian inscription. The same Assyrian king records that (in 842)
Yaua, son of Khumri, together with the Tyrians and Sidonians, paid him
tribute. Not a word of this in 1 Kings. Similar records of the northern
Aramæans are, unhappily, not extant. The final editor of the narratives
in 1 Kings must have believed that the Israelites had serious conflicts
with northern Aram, but underneath the traditional Hebrew text, lie
narratives, which can still be approximately restored, in which the
contending powers were not Israel and Aram-Damascus, but Israel and
Aram-Cusham. The Shimron and the Jezreel spoken of in these narratives
are not Samaria and the northern Jezreel, but places bearing those
names in the “Negeb.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account