The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia — John Shaqi
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
World history
We return to Athaliah, and her bold attempt to naturalise more fully
the sensuous religious developments of North Arabia in Judah. After
six years, both she and her movement came to a sudden end. The only
surviving male representative of David was set upon the throne. The
priest Jehoiada won over the “prætorian guard” on which Athaliah had
relied; the usurper was slain and the house of Baal broken down. The
new king Jehoash conformed to the directions of the priests. This did
not, however, avert a serious calamity. A Cushamite invasion took
place, and the retirement of Hazael had to be bought at a high price.
Jehoash was succeeded by his foolhardy son Amaziah, who seems to have
had a dream of throwing off the suzerainty of North Israel. As the
first step to this, he tried his martial prowess on the Jerahmeelites,
whom he encountered in a valley in the Negeb, but when Joash of Israel,
who had no mind to let Judah become predominant in that region, came
down upon him with his army, the result was disastrous for Judah.
Jerusalem was taken, so that the suzerainty of northern Israel was
secured, and the king, Amaziah, met with a violent death. His son and
successor, Azariah (or Uzziah), is to some extent a mystery; we have
two narratives respecting him, one of which surprises us as much by its
brevity as the other (2 Chronicles xxvi.) by its particularity. The
probability, however, is that the account in 2 Kings xv. 1-7 omits all
detailed reference to Azariah’s wars in the south because of a great
humiliation which he received in the course of them. That heavy blow
was probably nothing less than captivity in Mizrim, from the record of
which, accidentally or deliberately, the later tradition extracted the
statement that Azariah was smitten with leprosy. During his father’s
enforced absence, Jotham acted as regent. We can hardly believe that
the period of these two reigns was in any sense a prosperous one for
Judah. No special misfortune, indeed, is put down to Jotham, but we are
informed that the king of Aram or Cusham began those incursions into
Judah which became such a serious danger in the next reign. Whether
either Azariah or Jotham succeeded in becoming independent of Israel,
we cannot say.
AHAZ AND ISAIAH
It was Ahaz, so well known to us from the prophet Isaiah, who succeeded
Jotham. The editors of the Books of Kings and of Isaiah believed that
the “Aram,” which became so troublesome to Ahaz, was the North Aramæan
kingdom of Damascus, and that the ruler of this state in conjunction
with Pekah, king of Israel, fearing the aggressions of Assyria, sought
to force Judah into alliance with them. It was notorious that Ahaz
favoured a different policy, but the allies thought themselves strong
enough to capture Jerusalem and to place a nominee of their own upon
the throne of Judah.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account