The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
World history
The reform of the cultus, and the prohibition of more than the one
sanctuary, were far-reaching measures which affected the daily life
of every Israelite. We are even told (2 Kings xxiii. 15-20) that the
reformation extended to Beth-el and the cities of Shimron, _i.e._, to
the Negeb. This view of the narrator’s meaning is a solid result of
criticism, and certainly the detail has no slight verisimilitude. The
realm of Judah needed expansion, and what region could Josiah more
reasonably covet than the Negeb, so dear to Israelite tradition? Events
proved, however, that a greater potentate also had designs upon it,
viz., the king of Mizrim. We do not know what race predominated at
this time in the ancient Muzri, but we can hardly doubt the fact that
the king of a territory adjoining the Negeb, who was at any rate more
powerful than Josiah, went upon an expedition against Kidsham (_i.e._,
Kadesh), or perhaps Cusham (_i.e._, Cusham-jerahmeel), and found his
passage barred by Josiah. A battle took place in Maacath-migdol (if we
rightly read the name), and the king of Judah was mortally wounded.
All Judah mourned. The people had lost a king, and were in danger of
losing a faith. For the religious law book promising prosperity to the
obedient, which they had accepted in deference to the king and the
priests, seemed to have been proved a delusion and a snare.
JOSIAH’S SUCCESSORS AND THE KING OF MIZRAIM
Thus the power most dreaded by Judah is once more the North Arabian
Mizrim, though the race which now predominated in Mizrim had, perhaps,
only lately arrived there. The late editor of Kings, however,
confounded Mizrim with Mizraim (Egypt), and represented the king whom
Josiah encountered as Neku of Egypt; he also confounded the place-name
Migdol with Megiddo. It is not impossible that the enterprising Neku
of Egypt really did interfere with the affairs of Syria, but, if so,
it was hardly Josiah whom he had to deal with. It appears to be clear
from the Hebrew narratives, critically interpreted, that it was first
the Mizrites and then the Babelites or Jerahmeelites (_i.e._, the
peoples to which the Hebrew writers, archaising, apply these names) who
interfered with southern Palestine. The Mizrite king is said to have
deposed Josiah’s successor, Jehoahaz, after a reign of three months,
and nominated a brother of Jehoahaz named Eliakim or Jehoiakim, as king
(608 or 607 B.C.?). It was a short-lived suzerainty; another king,
miscalled by the later editor the king of Babel (the name should be
“Jerahmeel”), appeared, and asserted his claim to the Negeb. Jehoiakim
became his vassal, but after three years rebelled, preferring the
old vassalage to the new. Apparently he died before a fresh invasion
took place; it was his son Jehoiachin who, yielding to necessity,
surrendered to the Jerahmeelite army, and together with the principal
citizens of Jerusalem, including the prophet Ezekiel, was deported.
A third son of Josiah, named Mattaniah or Zedekiah, was appointed
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account