The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
World history
The splendid victories over the Persians had for some time taken Sparta,
which was fitted for a quiet and passive existence, out of her natural
sphere; and her king, Pausanias, had wished to betray his country for
the glitter of an Asiatic prince. But this state soon perceived her true
interest, and sent no more commanders to Asia, “that her generals might
not be made worse”: she likewise wished to avoid any further war with
the Persians, thinking that Athens was better fitted to carry it on than
herself. If the speech were now extant in which Hetoëmaridas the Heraclid
proved to the councillors that it was not expedient for Sparta to aim at
the mastery of the sea, we should doubtless possess a profound view, on
the Spartan side, of those things which we are now accustomed to look on
with Athenian eyes. Nor is it true that the supremacy over the Greeks
was in fact transferred at all from Sparta to Athens, if we consider
the matter as Sparta considered it, however great the influence of this
change may have been on the power of Athens. But Sparta continued to
hold its pre-eminence in the Peloponnese, and most of the nations of the
mother-country joined themselves to her: while none but the Greeks of
Asia Minor and the islands, who had previously been subjects of Persia,
and were then only partially liberated, perhaps too much despised by
Sparta, put themselves under the command of Athens. But the complete
liberation of Asia Minor from the Persian yoke, which has been considered
one of the chief exploits of Athens, was in fact never effected. The
Athenian empire did not prevent the vassals and subjects of the king of
Persia from ruling over the Greeks of Asia Minor, even down to the very
coast. We need not go any further to prove the entire falsehood of the
account commonly given by the panegyrical rhetoricians of Athens.
[Illustration: GREEK SHOVELS
(In the British Museum)]
[Sidenote: [479-465 B.C.]]
The Peloponnese took the less concern in these proceedings, as internal
differences had arisen from some unknown cause, which led to an open
war between Sparta and Arcadia. We only know that, between the battle
of Platæa (in which Tegea, as also later still, showed great fidelity
towards Sparta) and the war with the Helots (_i.e._ between 479 and
465 B.C.), the Lacedæmonians fought two great battles, the one against
the Tegeatæ and Argives at Tegea, the other against all the Arcadians,
with the exception of the Mantineans, at Dipæa (ἐν Διπαιεῦοιν), in the
Mænalian territory. Tisamenus, an Elean, of the family of the Iamidæ, was
in both battles in the Spartan army; and in both Sparta was victorious.
[Sidenote: [465-451 B.C.]]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account