The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
World history
This war had not been brought to a termination, when, in the year 465
B.C., a tremendous earthquake destroyed Sparta, and a sudden ruin
threatened to overwhelm the chief state of Greece. For, in the hope of
utterly annihilating their rulers, many helots revolted, and the war was
called the Third Messenian War. Upon this the Lacedæmonians, foreseeing
a tedious siege, called in the aid of their allies; and this call was
answered among others by the Athenians; the Spartans, however, dismissed
them, as we have seen, before the fortress was taken.
Immediately after the dismission of the Athenians from Ithome, the
injured people of Athens annulled the alliance with Sparta, which had
subsisted since the Persian War. Then followed the war with the maritime
towns of Argolis, in which Athens, after many reverses, at length
succeeded in destroying the fleet of Ægina, and subjugating that island
(457 B.C.). The inactivity of Sparta during these astonishing successes
of her enemy (for when she concluded the armistice with Athens she must
have partly foreseen its consequences) seems to prove that she was
entirely occupied with the final capture of Ithome, and the settlement of
her interests in Arcadia.
The five years’ truce in 451 B.C. was only an armistice between Athens
and the Peloponnesian confederacy, which left Bœotia to shake off the
Athenian yoke by her own exertions. At the end of these five years Megara
revolted from the Athenians, and in consequence an invasion of Attica
by the Peloponnesians took place, which, though it did not produce any
immediate result, was soon followed by the Thirty Years’ Truce, in which
Athens ceded her conquests in Megaris and the Peloponnese, and on the
mainland returned within her ancient boundaries.
If now we consider the events which have been briefly traced it will be
perceived, that the principle on which the Lacedæmonians constantly acted
was one of self-defence, of restoring what had been lost, or preserving
what was threatened with danger; whereas the Athenians were always aiming
at attack or conquest, or the change of existing institutions. While the
Spartans during this period, even after the greatest victories, did not
conquer a foot of land, subjugate one independent state, or destroy one
existing institution; the Athenians, for a longer or for a shorter time,
reduced large tracts of country under their dominion, extended their
alliance (as it was called) on all sides, and respected no connection
when it came in conflict with their plans of empire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account