The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
World history
These obvious points of difference are sufficient to substantiate the
result which we wish to arrive at. The “honesty and openness” of the
Doric character, the noble simplicity of the ancient times of Greece,
soon disappeared in this tumultuous age. Sparta therefore and the
Peloponnesians emerge from the contest, altered, and as it were reversed;
and even before its termination appear in a character of which they had
before probably contained only the first seeds.
[Sidenote: [460-405 B.C.]]
But in the second half of the war, when the Spartans gave up their great
armaments by land, and began to equip fleets with hired seamen; when
they had learnt to consider money as the chief instrument of warfare,
and begged it at the court of Persia; when they sought less to protect
the states joined to them by affinity and alliance, than to dissolve
the Athenian confederacy; when they began to secure conquered states
by harmosts of their own, and by oligarchs forced upon the people, and
found that the secret management of the political clubs was more to their
interest than open negotiation with the government; we see developed on
the one hand an energy and address, which was first manifested in the
enterprises of the great Brasidas, and on the other a worldly policy, as
was shown in Gylippus, and afterwards more strongly in Lysander; when the
descendants of Hercules found it advisable to exchange the lion’s for the
fox’s skin. And since the enterprises conducted in the spirit of earlier
times either wholly failed or else remained fruitless, this new system,
though the state had inwardly declined, brought with it, by the mockery
of fate, external fame and victory.[b]
Whatever nobility of creed the Sparta-loving Müller has, as above,
claimed for Sparta up to this time, it is certain that the sudden
accession of vast and unforeseen power changed her to a mood in which,
as Bury says, “she cynically set aside her high moral professions and
yielded to a lust for oppression.” Grote was no lover of Sparta and yet
he substantiates well his accusations against her.[a]
GROTE’S COMPARISON OF SPARTAN AND ATHENIAN RULE
[Sidenote: [405-404 B.C.]]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account