The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
World history
But the astonishing energy of the Athenians, which from one point kept
the whole of Greece in constant vibration, almost paralysed Sparta; the
natural slowness of that state became more and more apparent: which
having been, as it were, violently transplanted into a strange region,
only began by degrees to comprehend the policy of Athens. It is manifest
that the maxims of the Athenian policy were directly at variance with the
general feeling of justice entertained by the Greeks, and especially to
the respect for affinity of blood; and this fundamental difference was
the true cause of the Peloponnesian War. In the first place then, Dorians
were opposed to Ionians; and hence in the well-known oracle it was
called the Doric War. It was a union of the free Greeks against the evil
ambition of one state: of land forces against sea forces: the fleet of
the Peloponnesians was at the beginning of the war very inconsiderable.
Hence it was some time before the belligerent parties even so much as
encountered one another; the land was the means of communication for one
party, the sea for the other: hence the states friendly to Athens were
immediately compelled to build Long Walls for the purpose of connecting
the chief city with the sea, and isolating it from the land. Large bodies
of men practised in war fought against wealth: the Peloponnesians
carried on the war with natives; whereas Athens manned her fleet--the
basis of her power--chiefly with foreign seamen; so that the Corinthians
said justly that the power of Athens was rather purchased than native.
It was the main principle of Pericles’ policy, and it is also adopted by
Thucydides in the famous introduction to his _History_, that it is not
the country and people, but moveable and personal property in the proper
sense of the word, which make states great and powerful. The war meant
the maintenance of ancient custom as opposed to the desire for novelty:
the former was the chief feature of the Doric, the latter of the Ionic
race. The Dorians wished to preserve their ancient dignity and power, as
well as their customs and religious feelings: the Ionians were commonly
in pursuit of something new. It was a union of nations and tribes against
one arbitrarily formed: aristocracy was pitted against democracy:
this difference was manifested in the first half of the war by Athens
changing, while Sparta only restored governments; for in this instance
also the power of Sparta was in strictness only employed in upholding
ancient establishments, as an aristocracy may indeed be overthrown, but
cannot be formed in a moment.
[Illustration: GRECIAN TERRA-COTTA STATUETTE
(In the British Museum)]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account