The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
World history
Lacedæmon’s two royal houses, however, had been retained, and it should
have been the function of these to maintain discipline in the state. But
the newly-acquired wealth of Sparta, coupled with the growing authority
of the ephors, appreciably diminished the power of the kings. Reduced to
the rôle of hereditary generals these monarchs could never depart on an
expedition without being accompanied by ten supervisors, who, under the
name of councillors, in reality directed all the military operations.
During the last years of the Peloponnesian War the decisive battles had
been fought on sea, and the fleets were commanded, captives sold, cities
ransomed and subsidies received from the Great King by men who were not
of pure Spartan blood. Aristotle in his _Politics_ calls the office of
admiral among them “a second royalty.”
Lysander was not obeying the dictates of ambition when, as Sparta’s
leading citizen, he undertook to reform for his own advantage the
political system of the city. “He could not,” says Plutarch, “see without
regret a city whose glory he had done so much to increase governed by
kings who had no more ability to rule than he, so he formed the plan of
depriving the reigning houses of their dignity to make it the common
appanage of all the Heraclids.” The discovery of the plot of Cinadon
[described later] revealed an abyss of hatred yawning beneath the social
system of Sparta, and at the same time an alarming unanimity of feeling
between the inferior classes, both free and slaves. A civil war could
easily have resulted from the situation; but Sparta, with that vigilance
which continued distrust arouses in all oligarchies, discovered and
baffled all the plots that were formed against her.
Yet in spite of this hostility between the classes, in spite of many
other difficulties, such as strife between the kings on the one hand
and the senators and the ephors on the other, in which the kings were
reduced almost to the condition of subjects, and rivalry between the
kings themselves, the Spartan government, by reason of concentration of
authority in a few hands, was powerful enough for action against other
states. At home and abroad the ephors and the harmosts, those so-called
conciliators, exercised a permanent dictatorship, maintaining garrisons
at Megara, Ægina, Tanagra, Pharsalus, Heraclea in Trachinia, at the
entrance of Thermopylæ; also Dionysius of Syracuse was Sparta’s ally. But
this power, widespread as it was, was scarcely more than an influence,
and an influence that was already on the wane, since the nation that
lacks citizens has no resources within itself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account