The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
World history
George W. Cox, in his _General History of Greece_, recognises in the
treaty a humiliation for Sparta as well as for the rest of Greece, since
the peace was not drawn up in the form of an agreement, but rather forced
upon Greece by the edict of Persia. It was indeed a fiat “sent down from
Susa,” like another royal decree to the subjects whom the Persian king
looked down upon with oriental disdain. Cox writes thus fervidly:
“The Persian king chose to regard the acceptance of the peace by the
Spartans as an act of submission not less significant than the offering
of earth and water. In the disgrace which it involved the one was as
ignominious as the other; but Sparta had now not even the poor excuse
which long ago she had put forward for calling in the aid of the
barbarian. She was no longer struggling for self-preservation. In short,
by Sparta the Peace of Antalcidas was adopted with the settled resolution
to divide and govern; and all of those of her acts, which might seem at
first sight to have a different meaning, carry out in every instance
this golden rule of despotism. It was the curse of the Hellenic race,
and the ruin ultimately of Sparta itself, that this maxim flattered
an instinct which they had cherished with blind obstinacy, until it
became their bane. But for Sparta, the consolidation of the Athenian
empire would long ago have restrained this self-isolating sentiment
within its proper limits. In theory the Spartans by enforcing the Peace
of Antalcidas restored to the several Greek states the absolute power
of managing their own affairs, and of making war upon one another. In
practice Sparta was resolved that their armies should move only at her
dictation, that into her treasury should flow the tribute, the gathering
of which was denounced as the worst crime of imperial Athens, and that in
the government of the oligarchical factions she should have the strongest
material guarantee for the absolute submission of the Greek cities. To
secure this result the Hellenic states of Lesser Asia were abandoned to
the tender mercies of Persian tax-gatherers, and left to feel the full
bitterness of the slavery from which Athens had rescued them some ninety
years ago.”
An outcome which none could have foreseen from the acceptance of this
humiliating title-deed to Grecian independence was the sudden and
rocket-like rise of the city of Thebes, a city which had heretofore been
a second-or third-rate town chiefly distinguished for being on the wrong
side of Hellenic questions. Thebes is now about to break forth into flame
with a fire-brand named Epaminondas, one of the noblest and most splendid
names in all the glitter of Grecian history.[a]
FOOTNOTES
[9] [This statement of Xenophon is, according to Grote, either a
mis-reading or a wild exaggeration. Diodorus says that the Spartans lost
1100; the allies 2800.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account