The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
World history
[10] [On this point Bury says: “Though the battle of Coronea, like the
battle of Corinth, was a technical victory for the Spartans, history must
here again offer her congratulations to the side which was superficially
defeated.… It was a great moral encouragement to Thebes for future warfare
with Lacedæmon.”]
[Illustration]
[Illustration: GREEK PINS AND BUCKLE
(In the British Museum)]
CHAPTER XLIV. THE RISE OF THEBES
The brilliant expansion of the power of Sparta after the King’s Peace
is intimately connected with the name of Agesilaus. Therefore in order
rightly to understand the significance and the results of the Peace of
Antalcidas, we must first form some idea of the tendencies and political
position of this eminent man. Nothing but a just appreciation of his
personality will suffice to keep us from tossing rudderless between the
Scylla and Charybdis of diametrically opposite views of the object of the
peace, and of Sparta’s policy at that period.
Agesilaus was from the outset the typical representative of the Sparta
of his time. All his thoughts and energies had their root in his own
state alone, and to exalt this state to the position of the first power
in the world, to gain for it the hegemony of Hellenic affairs, was his
object, as it was the object of the whole contemporary policy of Sparta.
To this end he laboured with admirable consistency through all his long
life, from his first campaign in Asia to his expedition into Egypt, and
all his acts, whether as a victorious monarch or an adventurous leader
of mercenaries, were directed to one end--to vindicate the authority of
Sparta. And when this end could not be attained by force of arms he was
equal to compassing it by diplomatic moves. Hence it is certain that the
Peace of Antalcidas was not concluded without his knowledge and consent,
even if circumstances rendered it desirable for him to keep in the
background during the negotiations in Asia.
Lacedæmon found herself incapable of maintaining by mere force of arms
the position which had devolved upon her through the events of the
Peloponnesian War, and if Sparta were not to abdicate the hegemony of
Greece she must perforce try to conclude an advantageous peace and an
alliance with Persia. This project was favoured by the ill-timed attempts
of Athens to regain her maritime supremacy, and the Spartans, rightly
gauging the situation, associated with these attempts their conciliatory
negotiations with Persia. That this step, which closed to him henceforth
his career of glory in Asia, was an easy one for Agesilaus to take, is
unlikely; it was a political necessity, the inevitable consequence of the
lines along which Greek policy had developed for the last thirty years.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account