The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
World history
Socrates, it appears indeed, was not inclined to deny his disapprobation
of the Athenian constitution. His defence itself, as it is reported
by Plato, contains matter on which to found an accusation against him
of disaffection to the sovereignty of the people, such as, under the
jealous tyranny of the Athenian democracy, would sometimes subject a man
to the penalties of high treason. “You well know,” he says, “Athenians,
that, had I engaged in public business, I should long ago have perished,
without procuring any advantage either to you or to myself. Let not
the truth offend you: it is no peculiarity of your democracy, or of
your national character; but wherever the people is sovereign, no man
who shall dare honestly to oppose injustice, frequent and extravagant
injustice, can avoid destruction.”
Without this proof indeed we might reasonably believe that, though
Socrates was a good and faithful subject of the Athenian government,
and would promote no sedition, no political violence, yet he could not
like the Athenian constitution. He wished for wholesome changes by
gentle means; and it seems even to have been a principal object of the
labours to which he dedicated himself, to infuse principles into the
rising generation that might bring about the desirable change insensibly.
His scholars were chiefly sons of the wealthiest citizens, whose easy
circumstances afforded leisure to attend him; and some of these,
zealously adopting his tenets, others merely pleased with the ingenuity
of his arguments and the liveliness of his manner, and desirous to
emulate his triumphs over his opponents, were forward, after his example,
to engage in disputation upon all the subjects on which he was accustomed
to discourse. Thus employed and thus followed, though himself avoiding
office and public business, those who governed or desired to govern the
commonwealth through their influence among the many, might perhaps not
unreasonably consider him as one who was, or might become, a formidable
adversary; nor might it be difficult to excite popular jealousy against
him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account