The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
World history
Meletus, who stood forward as his principal accuser, was, according to
Plato, not a man of any great consideration. He was soon joined by Lycon,
one of the most powerful speakers of his time, and the avowed patron
of the rhetoricians, who, as well as the poets, thought their interest
injured by the moral philosopher’s doctrine. But Anytus, a man scarcely
second to any in the commonwealth in rank and general estimation, who had
held high command with reputation in the Peloponnesian War, and had been
the principal associate of Thrasybulus in the war against the Thirty and
the restoration of the democracy, declared himself a supporter of the
prosecution. Nothing in the accusation could, by any known law of Athens,
affect the life of the accused. In England no man would be put upon trial
on so vague a charge: no grand jury would listen to it. But in Athens, if
the party was strong enough, it signified little what was the law. When
Lycon and Anytus came forward, Socrates saw that his condemnation was
already decided.
By the course of his life, however, and by the turn of his thoughts
for many years, he had so prepared himself for all events, that the
probability of his condemnation, far from being alarming, was to him
rather matter for rejoicing, as, at his age, a fortunate occurrence.
Xenophon says that, by condescending to a little supplication, Socrates
might easily have obtained his acquittal. It was usual for accused
persons, when brought before the court, to bewail their apprehended lot,
with tears to supplicate favour, and by exhibiting their children upon
the bema, to endeavour to excite pity. No admonition or entreaty of his
friends however could persuade him to such an unworthiness. He thought
it, he said, more respectful to the court, as well as more becoming
himself, to omit all this; however aware that their sentiments were
likely so far to differ from his that judgment would be given in anger
for it. Accordingly, when put upon his defence, he told the people that
he did not plead for his own sake, but for theirs, wishing them to avoid
the guilt of an unjust sentence.
Condemnation pronounced wrought no change upon him. He again addressed
the court, declared his innocence of the matters laid against him, and
observed that, even if every charge had been completely proved, still
altogether did not, according to any known law, amount to a capital
crime. “But,” in conclusion he said, “it is time to depart: I to die, you
to live: but which for the greater good, God only knows.”
[Illustration: SOCRATES IN PRISON]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account