The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 05 : $b the Roman Republic
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 05 : $b the Roman Republic
World history
That there were only four vestal virgins before, and that Tarquinius
made them six, would certainly seem to show, that a third part of the
state had hitherto been below the other two-thirds, at least in matters
of religion; for it was always acknowledged that the six vestal virgins
represented the three tribes of the Ramnes, Tities, and Luceres, two for
each tribe. But in the additions made to the senate and to the centuries,
the new citizens must have been more than a third of the old ones; and
indeed here the story supposes that in military matters, at any rate,
the Luceres were already on an equality with the Ramnes and Tities. It
is enough therefore to say, that there had arisen at Rome so great a
number of distinguished families, of whatever origin, or from whatever
causes, that an extension of the rights of citizenship became natural
and almost necessary: but as these were still only a small part of the
whole population, the change went no further than to admit them into the
aristocracy; leaving the character and privileges of the aristocracy
itself, with regard to the mass of the population, precisely the same as
they had been before.
But a far greater change was effected soon afterwards; no less than the
establishment of a new constitution, on totally different principles.
This constitution is no doubt historical, however uncertain may be the
accounts which relate to its reputed author. “The good king Servius and
his just laws,” were the objects of the same fond regret amongst the
Roman commons, when suffering under the tyranny of the aristocracy, as
the laws of the good king Edward the Confessor amongst the English after
the Norman conquest; and imagination magnified, perhaps, the merit of
the one no less than of the other: yet the constitution of Servius was a
great work, and well deserves to be examined and explained. Servius, like
Tarquinius, is represented as a foreigner, and is said also, like him, to
have ascended the throne to the exclusion of the sons of the late king.
According to the account which Livy[d] followed, he was acknowledged by
the senate, but not by the people; and this, which seemed contradictory
so long as the people, populus, and the commons, plebs, were confounded
together, is in itself consistent and probable, when it is understood
that the people, who would not acknowledge Servius, were the houses
assembled in their great council of the curiæ, and that these were likely
to be far less manageable by the king whom they disliked, than the
smaller council of their representatives assembled in the senate. Now
supposing that the king, whoever he may have been, was unwelcome to what
was then the people, that is, to the only body of men who enjoyed civil
rights, it was absolutely necessary for him, unless he would maintain
his power as a mere tyrant, through the help of a foreign paid guard, to
create a new and different people out of the large mass of inhabitants
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account