The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 06 : $b the early Roman Empire — John Shaqi
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 06 : $b the early Roman Empire
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 06 : $b the early Roman Empire
World history
Nevertheless, it is commonly held that posterity has made no mistake in
fixing upon the date of the accession of Augustus as a turning-point in
the history of the Roman commonwealth. However fully the old forms may
have been held to, it is only now that the people in effect submit to
a permanent dictator. The office of dictator, as such, had indeed been
abolished on the motion of Mark Antony; but the cæsars managed, under
cover of old names and with the ostensible observance of old laws, to
usurp dictatorial power. There was an actual, even if not a nominal,
change of government. This change of government, however, did not
coincide with any sudden decline in Roman power. On the contrary, as
just intimated, the Roman influence under the early cæsars reached out
to its widest influence and attained its maximum importance. Certainly,
the epochs which by common consent are known as the golden and the silver
ages of Roman literature--the time, that is to say, of Augustus and his
immediate successors--cannot well be thought of as periods of great
national degeneration. And again the time of the five good emperors has
by common consent of the historians been looked on as among the happiest
periods of Roman history. In a word the first two centuries of Roman
imperial history are by no means to be considered as constituting an
epoch of steady decline. That a decline set in after the death of Marcus
Aurelius, some causes of which were operative much earlier, is, however,
equally little in question. Looking over the whole sweep of later Roman
history it seems difficult to avoid the conclusion that the empire was
doomed almost from the day of its inception, notwithstanding its early
period of power. But when one attempts to point out the elements that
were operative as causes of this seemingly predestined overthrow, one
enters at once upon dangerous and debatable ground. At the very outset,
as already intimated, the prejudices of the historian are enlisted _pro_
or _con_ by the question of the influence of Christianity as a factor in
accelerating or retarding the decay of Rome’s greatness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account