The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
World history
Mundhir, with vast hordes of Arabs behind him, was soon at the gates of
the capital, which lay only three or four days’ journey distant from
Hira, and no doubt the rightful heir to the throne could count upon a
party among the Persians. A compromise was therefore effected between
the disputants, Chosroes withdrew his claim, and Bahram ascended the
throne, but under promise to rule differently from his father and to do
the will of the nobles and priests. Bahram V, who bears the surname of
Gor, “the wild ass,” is a favourite with Persian tradition, which tells
absolutely fabulous stories of him. He was young when he became king,
and to the end of his days he was jovial and much addicted to women. The
change of policy was immediately signalised by two things--the outbreak
of a systematic persecution of the Christians, and a war with Rome. Both
sides could easily find pretexts for war, but it is most likely that the
Persian nobles urged it on; the Romans would certainly not have entered
on the struggle merely on account of the persecution.
The main theatre of war was in Persian Mesopotamia and the mountain
tracts that bounded it on the north. The Persian commander was Mihr
Narseh, one of the most powerful nobles. A vainglorious Persian tradition
relates that he made a victorious entry into Constantinople, but we know
that, on the contrary, he suffered a severe defeat at the very beginning
of the war (August, 421). The Romans besieged Nisibis for a long time,
but the approach of a fresh force compelled them hastily to raise the
siege. Mundhir, to whom Bahram owed his throne, was eager to devastate
Syria with his Arabs, but was forced to retreat with great loss. The
war, concerning the progress of which we have no adequate information,
enfeebled both sides to such an extent that they quickly became anxious
to end it. In the terms of peace (422) the Persians promised to allow the
Christians the free exercise of their religion, and the Romans undertook
to do likewise to the Zoroastrians.
The desire of the Persians for peace was most likely due to the fact that
they were again involved in warfare with the rulers of the Bactria of
that day and the neighbouring countries, the tribe of the Kushan, Haital
(Hephthalites), or “white Huns.” To this perpetual conflict the Romans
probably owed their rest from Persian invasion in the fifth century.
We are not bound to take the word of Persian tradition for Bahram’s
brilliant victory over the Hephthalites.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account