The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
World history
In Persian Armenia yearnings after independence had asserted themselves
during the war with Rome, but when peace was concluded Bahram could
again install a vassal king there; the selfish Armenian nobles, however,
went to such lengths that the Persians were finally driven to do away
with the Armenian monarchy altogether and to convert the country into a
province (429), as the Romans had long since done with their portion of
it. In this the Persians had the assistance of a strong party among the
Armenians themselves, though as a matter of fact the Persian satraps had
no less trouble with the barons and priests than with the kings before
them.
After the death of Bahram (438 or 439) his son Yezdegerd II became
king. He persecuted both Christians and Jews, nor is there much to be
set to his credit in other respects. He abolished the audiences, on
the first day of every month, in which any man of consequence was free
to lay grievances or petitions before the king. The story goes that he
married his own daughter (though that was no crime in the opinion of the
Zoroastrians, who considered such marriages positively meritorious) and
afterwards killed her.
WAR WITH THE HEPHTHALITES
[Sidenote: [457-489 A.D.]]
Upon the death of Yezdegerd II (457) a quarrel seems to have broken
out immediately between his sons, Hormuzd III, king (that is to say,
“prince-satrap”) of Sagastan, and Peroz, who were the children of one
mother, Dinak by name. Hormuzd, the elder, held his ground for a while,
but at the end of two years Peroz supplanted him by the help of the
Hephthalites and the active exertions of Raham, of the noble house of
Mihran. He caused three others of his nearest kinsmen to be put to death,
as well as his brother. He, again, was hostile to Christians and Jews,
but he had political insight enough to favour the conversion of his
Christian subjects to the doctrines of Nestorius, which had been banished
as archheresy from the Roman Empire. At the synod held at Beth Lapat in
the year 483 or 484, the ancient Christian church of the Persian Empire
adopted the Nestorian confession; and being thenceforward separated
by a great gulf from the Roman Christians, was consequently even less
dangerous to the state than it had been before.
But, as a matter of fact, Christianity in Persia had never been really
much of a menace to the country. The Armenians on the other hand joined
the monophysites, who had a large party in the Roman Empire and often had
the upper hand there.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account